“It might seem that thoughts are jumping around a little But The Climate Change debates, The concepts of Plurality the scientific method empirisism , Creationist ( 1. Singularity, Singular ) and Evolutionist (2 or more Singularities , Pluralist ) are very important when considering control of Markets, Statistical data sets and so on and so forth. See also the Blog on Dangerous Knowledge Cantor et al and work on infinity ( Big and Small ) and the perfect ratio. All of this is a distillation of the work of people like Alan Watt on the nature of randomness unpredictability and the Human need for a feeling of safety in an uncertain and fundamentally random world. Scientific detachment is great but one can not detach the esoteric and spiritual aspects of randomness the Creationist versus the Evolutionary view point is the most succinct evocation of the fundamental question of why are we here. The continuum is infinite without beginning or end for the evolutionist for the creationist the continuum has a beginning and an end and thus must be predictable.
This is a note I wrote in an economics discussion on the nature of Client bias in measures such as GDP, John Rankin is altogether more on the money but these themes are with thinkers such as Taleb whose star is bright right now. James Burke is very good on the dangers of specialisation especially in mental processes , Blind man and the elephant proverb deserves a google , Anyone reading this might remember the analogy.”

• Roger Lewis

Reification (fallacy)