Globalisation Un-Entangled. (Work in Progress, Danger Poet at Work)

 

shadows cast from secret whispers, taps on streams of digital Imprints what oppressor does not despise what oppression will not censor and misdirect
Secretive cabals of liberal political correctness

 

Self-censored fearing the exile of dissentGchq Nsa Kvd , hacking whos democracyWhat democracy, sings with the voice of explosions

 

Tripartate accords of old, a Gold Standard. As Piggs Shit Brics and Lutherean Shards profer Gaping anuses and Calvanist certainties Divine providence and eminent domain

 

Democracy perverted.
Union now as then in ´38, current quarrelsMr Striets Union and Mr Orwells NiggersNot counting Niggers, the other´s not like ussix hundred million disenfranchised, is it more today?

 

Show more rea “Ages ago,” Urthred continued, “we certainly used to speak

languages. We made sounds and we heard sounds. People used to think,
and then chose and arranged words and uttered them. The hearer
heard, noted, and retranslated the sounds into ideas. Then, in some
manner which we still do not understand perfectly, people began to
_get_ the idea before it was clothed in words and uttered in sounds.
They began to hear in their minds, as soon as the speaker had
arranged his ideas and before he put them into word symbols even in
his own mind. They knew what he was going to say before he said it.
This direct transmission presently became common; it was found out
that with a little effort most people could get over to each other
in this fashion to some extent, and the new mode of communication
was developed systematically.

“That is what we do now habitually in this world. We think directly
_to_ each other. We determine to convey the thought and it is
conveyed at once–provided the distance is not too great. We use
sounds in this world now only for poetry and pleasure and in moments
of emotion or to shout at a distance, or with animals, not for
the transmission of ideas from human mind to kindred human mind
any more. When I think to you, the thought, so far as it finds
corresponding ideas and suitable words in your mind, is reflected
in your mind. My thought clothes itself in words in your mind,
which words you seem to hear–and naturally enough in your own
language and your own habitual phrases. Very probably the members
of your party are hearing what I am saying to you, each with his
own individual difference of vocabulary and phrasing.”
http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks02/0200221.txt

I read this the other day, it forms a stanza in my latest poem.

Globalisation Un-Entangled. (Creative chaos????, WTF?

 

“Our education can be our governmentOur reason can be our Judge of the rivalsGlobalism Authority coercion and competitionor Nationalism, Internationalism Cooperation “

 

Je suis a Thought Leader,

 Je Habite La dans la… Ready.-MADES. 

DU-CHAMPS, “LEADERS OF THOUGHT”. 

Found Poetry, ready spoken , ready thought, I will not teach I will remind.

https://www.instagram.com/p/9xt9QeCecQ/

🚽

A post shared by lushsux (@lushsux) on Nov 7, 2015 at 12:26am PST

//platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js

 

Globalisation Un-Entangled. (Democracy Work In Progress)

 

Eliza with rogerian inscrutability

hears the confession of the mal-contents

A mirror held up before cosmetic application

Globalisation and Internationalism confused

 

despotism´s nature is to abhor any say

save that of its own momentary pleasure;

it annihilates all intermediate situations

between boundless strength on its own part,

and total debility on the part of the people.

Our education can be our government
Our reason can be our Judge of the rivals

Globalism Authority coercion and competition

or Nationalism, Internationalism Cooperation

Are we to have free will and democracy

Will we have determined authority

A struggle of ideal´s an ancient quarrel

Parmenides or Heraclitus navigators both

If centuries be epochs with peculiar discretion

19th, 20th, 21st a behind hand review

19^th innate goodness of man, nationalism

20^th Fallen man Calvinist rule, Globalism

 

Roger Lewis

Just now · 

DU_CHAMPS

http://www.masswerk.at/eliza/ I was delighted to find HG wells Grappling with the same Regardeur tableaux space in Title: Men Like Gods (1923)
Author: H.G. Wells

´´Mr. Barnstaple felt the ground slipping from under his feet. “But
I _hear_ you speaking English,” he said.

“Nevertheless we do not speak it,” said Urthred.

He smiled still more broadly. “We don’t–for ordinary
purposes–speak anything.”

Mr. Barnstaple, with his brain resigning its functions, maintained
his pose of deferential attention.

“Ages ago,” Urthred continued, “we certainly used to speak
languages. We made sounds and we heard sounds. People used to think,
and then chose and arranged words and uttered them. The hearer
heard, noted, and retranslated the sounds into ideas. Then, in some
manner which we still do not understand perfectly, people began to
_get_ the idea before it was clothed in words and uttered in sounds.
They began to hear in their minds, as soon as the speaker had
arranged his ideas and before he put them into word symbols even in
his own mind. They knew what he was going to say before he said it.
This direct transmission presently became common; it was found out
that with a little effort most people could get over to each other
in this fashion to some extent, and the new mode of communication
was developed systematically.

“That is what we do now habitually in this world. We think directly
_to_ each other. We determine to convey the thought and it is
conveyed at once–provided the distance is not too great. We use
sounds in this world now only for poetry and pleasure and in moments
of emotion or to shout at a distance, or with animals, not for
the transmission of ideas from human mind to kindred human mind
any more. When I think to you, the thought, so far as it finds
corresponding ideas and suitable words in your mind, is reflected
in your mind. My thought clothes itself in words in your mind,
which words you seem to hear–and naturally enough in your own
language and your own habitual phrases. Very probably the members
of your party are hearing what I am saying to you, each with his
own individual difference of vocabulary and phrasing.”

 

 

E.L.I.Z.A. Talking

E.L.I.Z.A. Talking is a project to explore speech I/O in modern browsers.

MASSWERK.AT

 

Globalisation Un-Entangled. the idea before it was clothed in words heard in minds, as uttered thought the communication of arranged ideas Thoughts lifting mist from the poets page.

This is my creative process not pretty.

the idea before it was clothed in words

The Simple see war is simply a football match 
conducted with cannons.wise men look 
not In  Nietzsche's Will to Power,  
but In the custom house.Says Bernard Shaw

THREE FACTORS IN EVERYONE Sir Arthur Salter,

for example “Shall we never pluck the best from fate

and find the Golden Mean? Must we ever choose freedom

without order, or order without freedom? Must justice

and mercy bring always weakness in their train,

and strength bring tyranny? Not one of the educational

co-ordinators in Utopia he, or is Elysisum Bodiccea disguised.

The proposals to change the current state of affairs –

included in the rejected European Constitution or

in the not much different Lisbon Treaty – would

make this defect even worse. Since there is no European demos –

and no European nation – this defect cannot be solved by

strengthening the role of the European Parliament, either

In practice, the existence of euro has shown that

forcing an economically disparate Europe into

a homogeneous entity through a political decision

is political engineering par excellence, far from

beneficial for all countries concerned

 

• 1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment,[52] leading role of Nobel Prize winner Willy Brandt and Olof Palme,[53] Germany saw enhanced international research cooperation on the greenhouse topic as necessary[52]

Daniel Patrick Moynihan, pioneer of the political treatment of the greenhouse effect

• 1969, on Initiative of US President Richard Nixon, NATO tried to establish a third civil column and planned to establish itself as a hub of research and initiatives in the civil region, especially on environmental topics.[52] Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Nixons NATO delegate for the topic[52] named acid rain and the greenhouse effect as suitable international challenges to be dealt by NATO

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
– quoted in Robert Sobel‘s review of Past Imperfect: History According to the Movies, edited by Mark C. Carnes

Climate emails hacked by spies’

Interception bore hallmarks of foreign intelligence agency, says expert

• Science Editor, Steve Connor 

A highly sophisticated hacking operation that led to the leaking of hundreds of emails from the Climatic Research Unit in East Anglia was probably carried out by a foreign intelligence agency, according to the Government’s former chief scientist. Sir David King, who was Tony Blair’s chief scientific adviser for seven years until 2007, said that the hacking and selective leaking of the unit’s emails, going back 13 years, bore all the hallmarks of a co-ordinated intelligence operation – especially given their release just before the Copenhagen climate conference in December.

And now for a world government

I have never believed that there is a secret United Nations plot to take over the US. I have never seen black helicopters hovering in the sky above Montana. But, for the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible.

FT.COM

by: Gideon Rachman

A “world government” would involve much more than co-operation between nations. It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws. The European Union has already set up a continental government for 27 countries, which could be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the ability to deploy military force.

A taste of the ideas doing the rounds in Obama circles is offered by a recent report from the Managing Global Insecurity project, whose small US advisory group includes John Podesta, the man heading Mr Obama’s transition team and Strobe Talbott, the president of the Brookings Institution, from which Ms Rice has just emerged.´´

Sooner or later mankind must come to one universal peace, unless our race is to be destroyed by the increasing power of its own destructive inventions; and that universal peace must needs take the form of a government, that is to say, a law-sustaining organisation, in the best sense of the word religious—a government ruling men through the educated co-ordination of their minds in a common conception of human history and human destiny.

The Catholic Church was the first clearly conscious attempt to provide such a government in the wor1d. We cannot too earnestly. examine its deficiencies and inadequacies, for every lesson we can draw from them is necessarily of the greatest value in forming our ideas of our own international relationships.

The transformation of the world is a great, complicated and painful process. For this great task a great class is required. Big ships go on long voyages.

Wells: Yes, but for long voyages a captain and a navigator are required.

Stalin: That is true; but what is first required for a long voyage is a big ship. What is a navigator without a ship? An idle man.

Wells: The big ship is humanity, not a class.

Stalin: You, Mr. Wells, evidently start out with the assumption that all men are good. I, however, do not forget that there are many wicked men. I do not believe in the goodness of the bourgeoisie.

 

Wells: There was a case in the history of England, however, of a class voluntarily handing over power to another class. In the period between 1830 and 1870, the aristocracy, whose influence was still very considerable at the end of the eighteenth century, voluntarily, without a severe struggle, surrendered power to the bourgeoisie, which serves as a sentimental support of the monarchy. Subsequently, this transference of power led to the establishment of the rule of the financial oligarchy.

Monnet and Retinger: liberal establishment tools in the founding of Europe

Right before and after World War I, Monnet hooked up with leading figures in the Anglo-American establishment. One of the first was Lord Kindersley, who, over the course of his life, was a partner in Lazard Brothers, a chairman of the Hudson’s Bay Company, and a director of the Bank of England. Kindersley’s son is known to have become an executive of the Pilgrims Society [14], a group researched in great detail by this author as it has been the embodiment of the liberal Anglo-American establishment throughout the 20th and early 21st century.

The Role of Oligarchs in Russian Capitalism

But we are not aware of comparable data sets on nonlisted firms, so we rely on the data on the share of the stock market owned by the top 10 families. By that measure, ownership concentration in modern Russia is higher than in any other country for which the data are available. The top 10 families or ownership groups (a subset of Table 1) owned 60.2 percent of Russia’s stock market in June 2003. This percentage is much higher than in any country in continental Europe, where the share of 10 largest families is below 35 percent in small countries and below 30 percent in all large countries (Faccio and Lang, 2002). In the United States and the United Kingdom, this share The Role of Oligarchs in Russian Capitalism 139 is in single-digit percentages (Faccio and Lang, 2002, Claessens et al., 2002).8 In east Asian countries before 1997 crisis, the highest shares of 10 largest families were in Indonesia (58 percent), Philippines (52 percent), Thailand (43 percent) and Korea (37 percent) (Claessens, Djankov and Lang, 2000). The numbers for Indonesia and Philippines include the holdings of Suharto and Marcos families, each controlling 17 percent of total market capitalization in the respective countries. In Russia, the personal wealth of Yeltsin and Putin is considered to be very modest

TpHE present war has produced many catch- 
I words, among them, 

A War to End War,
An Inconclusive Peace,
The Destruction of
Militarism,
The Establishment of the Rights of
Nationalities on an Unassailable Basis,
Free Nego- tiation by Free Peoples,
and This Must Never Occur Again.

Thus we see that none of the catchwords except 
the last can possibly mean what they say; and 
when they are cheered each time they reappear 
in the Prime Minister's stock peroration. It Is 
evident that he himself offers them as no more than 
oratorical orchestration to the patriotic sentiment 
of the assembly. They can be taken literally 
only by Ignorant and simple persons to whom a 

INTRODUCTION xi

European war is simply a football match conducted
with cannons.

Cato's formula for the ending 
of the Punic wars was. Annihilate Carthage. 
Carthage was annihilated; but its annihilation 
brought no peace to Rome. The Irish are a con- 
tentious and troublesome people; and the 
proverbial receipt for peace in Ireland is to sink 
the island for ten minutes into the Atlantic. Let 
us suppose that Ireland is duly sunk, with England 
and Prussia moored to it, not for ten minutes, but 
for ever. The white and yellow races will still 
confront one another across the Pacific. Italy, 
France and Spain will still have to divide the heri- 
tage of the Moors. Sweden will still watch Russia 
with her hand qn her sword-hilt; and Russia will 
still bum to protect the Balkans, to wrest Con- 

xii INTERNATIONAL GOVERNMENT

stantinople from the followers of “the accursed
Mahound,” to cling to Poland like a big brother,
and to pick up more of the White Man’s Burden
in Asia than the other Powers may think healthy
for her, or than India, for instance, may be dis-
posed to cast on any shoulders but her own. Of
South America I say nothing except that it does
not look convincing as a Temple of Perpetual
Peace.
The
wise man looks for the cause of war not In
Nietzsche’s gospel of the Will to Power, or Lord
Roberts’s far blunter gospel of the British Will to
Conquer, but In the custom house. The formal
conquest of a territory may loom large as a senti-
mental grievance; but, as the case of Alsace-
Lorraine shows, it does not produce war. But
the appropriation of a market is another matter:
a very small economic grievance will rapidly be-
come the nucleus of an enormous mass of martial
and patriotic emotion. There is no prospect of
the end of this war being the end of International
market-cornering and tariff blockades; and as long
as war remains physically possible, such operations
will produce it as fatally in the future as in the
past.

”The reader of Pope, as of every author, is advised to begin by letting him say what he has to say, in his own manner to an open mind that seeks only to receive the impressions which the writer wishes to convey. First let the mind and spirit of the writer come into free, full contact with the mind and spirit of the reader, whose attitude at the first reading should be simply receptive. Such reading is the condition precedent to all true judgment of a writer’s work. All criticism that is not so grounded spreads as fog over a poet’s page. Read, reader, for yourself, without once pausing to remember what you have been told to think´´.

Henry Morley.

https://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2013/06/reflection.html

Reflection.

Time was, a sober Englishman would knock
His servants up, and rise by five o’clock,
Instruct his family in every rule,
And send his wife to church, his son to school.
To worship like his fathers, was his care;
To teach their frugal virtues to his heir;
To prove, that luxury could never hold;
And place, on good security, his gold.
Now times are changed, and one poetic itch
Has seized the court and city, poor and rich:

1. The Secret Constitution: Secret Cabinet Committees;
   2. We’re All Data Now: Secret Data Banks;
   3. In Time Of Crisis: Government Emergency Powers;
   4. The Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO): making up their own law and policy;
   5. A Gap In Our Defences – about bungling defence manufacturers and incompetent military planners who have botched every new radar system that Britain has installed since World War II;
   6. Zircon – about GCHQ with particular reference to a secret 500 million satellite

“Not Counting Niggers”

§23. — THREE FACTORS IN EVERYONE

The present decision-making system of the European Union is different from a classic parliamentary democracy, tested and proven by history. In a normal parliamentary system, part of the MPs support the government and part support the opposition. In the European Parliament, this arrangement has been missing. Here, only one single alternative is being promoted, and those who dare think about a different option are labelled as enemies of European integration… There is also a great distance (not only in a geographical sense) between citizens and Union representatives, which is much greater than is the case inside the member countries. This distance is often described as the democratic deficit, the loss of democratic accountability, the decision-making of the unelected – but selected – ones, as bureaucratisation of decision-making etc. The proposals to change the current state of affairs – included in the rejected European Constitution or in the not much different Lisbon Treaty – would make this defect even worse. Since there is no European demos – and no European nation – this defect cannot be solved by strengthening the role of the European Parliament, either.[19][20]

If Europe does not wake up, it will face hard times. A common monetary policy will not help. Member countries already react differently to the appreciation of the euro against the dollar, the rising cost of energy, food or raw materials, and Asian competition. . . . In practice, the existence of euro has shown that forcing an economically disparate Europe into a homogeneous entity through a political decision is political engineering par excellence, far from beneficial for all countries concerned.[23]

• Financial Institutions: Financial institutions generally support restrictive policies regarding global warming, particularly the implementation of carbon trading schemes and the creation of market mechanisms that associate a price with carbon. These new markets would require trading infrastructures which banking institutions are well positioned to provide. Financial institutions would also be positioned well to invest, trade and develop various financial instruments that they could profit from through speculative positions on carbon prices and the use of brokerage and other financial functions like insurance and derivative instruments.[23]
• Environmental groups: Environmental groups generally take ideological positions on global warming and favor strict restrictions on carbon dioxide emissions. Environmental groups, as activists, engage in raising awareness and attracting investment into the advocacy movement to further raise awareness.[24]
• Fossil fuel companies: Traditional fossil fuel corporations could benefit or lose from stricter global warming regulations. A reduction in the use of fossil fuels could negatively impact fossil fuel corporations.[25][26] However, the fact that fossil fuel companies are a large source of energy, are also the primary source of carbon dioxide, and are engaged in energy trading might mean that their participation in trading schemes and other such mechanisms might give them a unique advantage and makes it unclear whether traditional fossil fuel companies would all and always be against stricter global warming policies. As an example, Enron, a traditional gas pipeline company with a large trading desk heavily lobbied the government for the EPA to regulate CO2: they thought that they would dominate the energy industry if they could be at the center of energy trading.[27]
• Alternative energy companies: alternative energy companies like wind and solar generally support stricter global warming policies. They would expect their share of the energy market to expand as fossil fuels are made more expensive through trading schemes or taxes.[28]
• Nuclear energy companies: nuclear energy companies could see a renaissance in a world where fossil fuels are taxed directly or through a carbon trading mechanism. For this reason, it is likely that nuclear energy companies would likely support stricter global warming policies.[29]
• Traditional retailers and marketers: traditional retailers, marketers, and the general corporations respond by adopting policies that resonate with their customers. If “being green” helps a general corporation, then they could undertake modest programs to please and better align with their customers. However, since the general corporation does not make a profit from their particular position, it is unlikely that they would strongly lobby either for or against a stricter global warming policy position.[30]
• Governments: On the Australian Sunday morning political discussion show The Bolt Report, Richard Lindzen said in a 2011 interview that governments might use global warming as a rationale for additional taxes.[31]

• 1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment,[52] leading role of Nobel Prize winner Willy Brandt and Olof Palme,[53] Germany saw enhanced international research cooperation on the greenhouse topic as necessary[52]

• 1969, on Initiative of US President Richard Nixon, NATO tried to establish a third civil column and planned to establish itself as a hub of research and initiatives in the civil region, especially on environmental topics.[52] Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Nixons NATO delegate for the topic[52] named acid rain and the greenhouse effect as suitable international challenges to be dealt by NATO

‘Climate emails hacked by spies’

• Science Editor, Steve Connor 

A “world government” would involve much more than co-operation between nations. It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws. The European Union has already set up a continental government for 27 countries, which could be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the ability to deploy military force.

A taste of the ideas doing the rounds in Obama circles is offered by a recent report from the Managing Global Insecurity project, whose small US advisory group includes John Podesta, the man heading Mr Obama’s transition team and Strobe Talbott, the president of the Brookings Institution, from which Ms Rice has just emerged.´´

1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
10. Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.

Rosicrucian Manifestos[edit]

Origins[edit]

https://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2017/03/notes-for-peom-or-some-prose.html