“The judge ruled that An Inconvenient Truth contained nine scientific errors and thus must be accompanied by an explanation of those errors before being shown to school children. The judge said that showing the film without the explanations of error would be a violation of education laws.”
Al Gore has previous form in getting the facts 180 degrees backwards and I have previously Written about what I see as his 3 greatest Strikeouts.
OUR ONLY DEBT IS TO NATURE AND ‘WHAT IS’. ENVIRONMENTAL PRAGMATISM, LIVE AND LET LIVE.
I came across the question again the other day reading an Excellent Article on ” Fake News” in mainstream media Narratives,
How You Can Be Absolutely Certain That Mainstream Media Lies About Everything
The Article earnestly tells us that we must read this link to CounterPunch.
I made this comment, to which the writer of the article has yet to respond, some sort of cognitive dissonance would not be so surprising, in the circumstances?
Also, if genuinely Good things happen to be presented as Good by the Mass Media; then it will invariably be the case that they also are said to be Good for the wrong reasons.
Thus, the major output of the modern International Mass Media consists of only four categories:
1. Good presented as bad
2. Bad presented as Good
(That is to say simple inversion)
3. Good presented as Good for a bad reason
4. Bad presented as bad for a bad reason
(That is to say explanatory inversion)
These four categories, which can be summarized as either simple or explanatory inversion, account for all sustained and high-impact modern major Mass Media stories without any exceptions.
Therefore those who want to free their minds from the Mass Media must first avoid as much Mass Media output as possible, and secondly develop automatic negativistic behaviour towards the Mass Media output which they cannot avoid”.
7 thoughts on “Was The "Inconvienient Truth" Always a "Convienient Lie"? #CLimateChange #ParisAccord #TrumpsEPA #WattsUpWithThat #DeSmogBlog #ScienceofDoom”