Economic Models and Political Economy?
RE DSGE and Keen, See this post heading Importance of Debt.! (self.badeconomics)
submitted 16 minutes ago by tonefreqhz
The Importance of Debt
A fourth reason for the failure of the New Keynesian DSGE models, linking closely with the previous, is the omission of debt and household balance sheets more generally, which are crucial for understanding consumption and macroeconomic fluctuations.
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2016/12/why-central-bank-models-failed-and-how-to-repair-them.html
Further this https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/roke/1-4/roke.2013.04.01.xml Abstract In 1988 Basil Moore published his book Horizontalists and Verticalists: The Macroeconomics of Credit Money, which this year celebrates its 25th birthday. We discuss this book from today’s perspective, and in particular whether Moore’s main assertions have been validated or rejected by the development of central bank practice and academic monetary economics. We find that the book has impressively stood the test of time and, despite part of textbook economics still insisting on the money multiplier as an explanation for the money supply, it is not much of an exaggeration to say that we have all become ‘Horizontalists’ in the last 25 years. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O38bSfQdEpg&t=860s Published on Feb 3, 2016 The argument that banks originate loans and thereby create money and additional demand was once a commonplace position. But in the 1950s, American Neoclassicals in particular began to push the view that banks are effectively just intermediaries between savers and investors; the view that banks were uniquely important in capitalism became a fringe view. I cover this history and the revival of the endogenous money approach by Basil Moore, Augusto Graziani and others
Further this https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/roke/1-4/roke.2013.04.01.xml Abstract In 1988 Basil Moore published his book Horizontalists and Verticalists: The Macroeconomics of Credit Money, which this year celebrates its 25th birthday. We discuss this book from today’s perspective, and in particular whether Moore’s main assertions have been validated or rejected by the development of central bank practice and academic monetary economics. We find that the book has impressively stood the test of time and, despite part of textbook economics still insisting on the money multiplier as an explanation for the money supply, it is not much of an exaggeration to say that we have all become ‘Horizontalists’ in the last 25 years. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O38bSfQdEpg&t=860s Published on Feb 3, 2016 The argument that banks originate loans and thereby create money and additional demand was once a commonplace position. But in the 1950s, American Neoclassicals in particular began to push the view that banks are effectively just intermediaries between savers and investors; the view that banks were uniquely important in capitalism became a fringe view. I cover this history and the revival of the endogenous money approach by Basil Moore, Augusto Graziani and others
And Finally, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521914001070 β — subjective discounthttps://nnov.hse.ru/data/2015/03/26/1093260382/Euler_Derivation.pdf
1223
Snapshots:
https://www.reddit.com/r/badeconomics/comments/4xym7g/the_one_in_which_steve_keen_fails_at_dynamic/ In response to this Archived post. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJWxsRCHOKc Bernard Connely mentions DSGE in this Interview, what seems obvious is that both sides or all sides of the argument need to understand and look at the others starting assumptions, clearly no consensus can emerge until this is done. Its an area in Which an Intergral approach along Wilber lines is needed to wit. This Paper from Bernard Lietaer. http://www.lietaer.com/2010/01/an-integral-view-on-money/ http://theconquestofdough.weebly.com/
RE DSGE and Keen, See this post heading Importance of Debt.! from badeconomics
—
0046702273052
skype: rogerglewis
Skype telephone number +46406931188
Portfolio of on line Profiles( Go on be Nosy ) CLICK HERE PLEASE
#ConquestofDough
0046702273052
skype: rogerglewis
Skype telephone number +46406931188
Portfolio of on line Profiles( Go on be Nosy ) CLICK HERE PLEASE
#ConquestofDough
1 thought on “Economic Models and Political Economy. #Brexit and Democracy.”