The Skripal Deception. Mrs Mays BlairCon NEO CON CON

 In short, official propaganda is not designed to deceive the public (no more than the speeches in an actor’s script are intended to deceive the actor who speaks them). It is designed to be absorbed and repeated, no matter how implausible or preposterous it might be. Actually, it is often most effective when those who are forced to robotically repeat it know that it is utter nonsense, as the humiliation of having to do so cements their allegiance to the ruling classes (this phenomenon being a standard feature of the classic Stockholm Syndrome model, and authoritarian conditioning generally). The current “Russian hacking” hysteria is a perfect example of how this works. No one aside from total morons actually believes this official narrative (the substance of which is beyond ridiculous), not even the stooges selling it to us. This, however, is not a problem, because it isn’t intended to be believed … it is intended to be accepted and repeated, more or less like religious dogma. (It doesn’t matter what actually happened, i.e., whether the “hack” was a hack or a leak, or who the hackers or leakers were, or who they may have been working for, or what whoever’s motives may have been. What matters is that the ruling classes have issued a new official narrative and are demanding that every “normal” American stand up and swear allegiance to it.)

 The responses to Mrs Mays Statement yesterday in Parliament with the notable exception of One, Jeremy Corbyn, demonstrated the above thesis perfectly, for a weaker example look at the debate where all of the speakers prefaced their points with **I Believe in Free Markets, similar pledges usually preface comments on Climate Change.Foucault’s notion of the Epistime is also something of the sort getting at the same point.
”I would define the episteme retrospectively as the strategic apparatus which permits of separating out from among all the statements which are possible those that will be acceptable within, I won’t say a scientific theory, but a field of scientificity, and which it is possible to say are true or false. The episteme is the ‘apparatus’ which makes possible the separation, not of the true from the false, but of what may from what may not be characterised as scientific.” Michel Foucault.
  • In 2010, Gareth Williams, a British security employee, was found naked and decomposing in a padlocked holdall. The coroner ruled that it was an unlawful killing and that a professional contortionist would not have been able to get out of the bag. In the light of the events with Russia, will the Prime Minister now reopen that case to find out whether Mr Williams was indeed another victim of Vladimir Putin?
  • I recall the case that the hon. Gentleman has raised. As I said in response to an earlier question, investigations into criminal activity will be a matter for the police, and it is for them to determine whether they reopen the case.
“To understand ‘Nebula’, one has to abandon the established path of logic as far as finances and politics are concerned. No longer can there be mention of nation states, of political party colors or of any economic coherence. Our conclusion would be that, over 20 years, some economical forces, some of which are of the mafia-type linked to the political power and organized crime structures, have reached the 4th level of money laundering, in other words: Absolute Power.”
Safra , 9/11 Steele Dossier, Russian Mafia and Mossad?
 Bizarrely a Labour  MP  Chris Evans ( see above) asked Theresa May if she would be re-opening this case today?
This one will not open and I cannot launch an anonymous browser because it says I am under attack, Clearly sensitive shit.

@6mins 28 secs
Question: Sorry, when you say “highly likely”, you mean the assessment that chemical weapons were used in Douma by the Assad government forces?

Sergey Lavrov: No, I said “highly likely” as a new invention of the British diplomacy to describe why they punish people – because these people are highly likely guilty, like in Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll – when he described a trial. And when they discovered that the jury could be engaged, then the King said “Let’s ask the jury” and the Queen shouted “No jury! Sentence first – verdict afterwards.” That’s the logic of “highly likely”.

The Russian Ambassador to the Un made his statement which was professional and credible Nicki Hayley the US ambassador was risible and unconvincing, The BBC has not rushed to use this statement preferring the Bond Villain Smirk of Vlad the Impaler Putin at some sort of Russian Hyacinth Bouquet indoors outdoors party somewhere in Russia, Not quite a hollowed out mountain and stroking a cat whilst flinging peasants in the shark pool, if the BBC had that footage we would surely see it. For the other sides to this developing Conspiracy theory in the making. See my Twitter Feed.

Author: rogerglewis Looking for a Job either in Sweden or UK. Freelance, startups, will turń my hand to anything.

Leave a Reply