Verdict First said the Queen in our re told story of @Gnasherjew in Tattensvolk(sic) land. https://twitter.com/alexrubner is @Gnasherjew he is a virulent anti semite a rascist and sock pupeteer for neo liberal zionist fascism Verdict First!!!!http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2018/04/who-is-gnasherjew-labour-anti-semitism.html
42. When any person harms you, or speaks badly of you, remember that he acts or speaks from a supposition of its being his duty. Now, it is not possible that he should follow what appears right to you, but what appears so to himself. Therefore, if he judges from a wrong appearance, he is the person hurt, since he too is the person deceived. For if anyone should suppose a true proposition to be false, the proposition is not hurt, but he who is deceived about it. Setting out, then, from these principles, you will meekly bear a person who reviles you, for you will say upon every occasion, “It seemed so to him.”
by W. Stephen Gilbert
I enjoyed reading this article and have reflected on both it and the comments. I remember the Marc Wadsworth incident at the launch of the Chakrabarti report and have quietly observed the likes of Politics Home and Portland communications pouring on troubled waters where ever the opportunity suggested.
In the following collage @GnasherJew claims that I am Anti Semetic others jump in and condem and follow on with his lead. No Context no mind paid to the tweets which I made stating the following.
@Gnasherjew goes on to play to his gallery of accolytes Thus. Compunding his already agregious lie. Now Mr Gnasher is mis representing knowlingly there is no mistake in his mendacity.
If anyone is wondering I consider that it is Mr Gnasher who should consider his position and stop digging , the hole he is in is quite deep enough.
The Tweets singled out by gnashers very selective method are surrounded by context on my Twitter and Facebook feeds but also on my Blog , whilst some of the linked to material would constitute Holocaust denial by most definitions I myself am not a Denier. It is impossible to provide context and discuss these matters without reading watching and considering all sides of a question, (that is unless we have a bunch of Conclusions looking for an Accused.)
I observe the need for historical context and would recommend anyone to read the excellent Gas Chambers of Sherlock Holmes by Cromwell or indeed Kollestroms book. or the excellent wikipedia article on the Nolte controversy to get some idea of what people get themselves so excercised over.
I have also been fascinated by the Irving v Lipstadt case and the Faurrison Affair. Noam Chomsky is an intellectual hero of mine and perhaps this form Chomskys explication of his writing a foreward in Faurrisons book is worth visiting at this juncture.
The Faurisson Affair
Noam Chomsky writes to Lawrence K. Kolodney
It really about Freedom of Speech that is my interest in the Chabloz and Nazi Pug cases and the malicous communications act. Locking people up for even mistaken views is just silly, Sir Richard Evans the expert in the lipstadt case agrees with that view he makes it here in theis Oxford Union Debate.
9th April 2017
The example is the Chabloz Case. I found Ms Chabloz song Surviors highly offensive and in the grossest of mis-taste. There is though no right not to be offended and nor should there be. Ms Chabloz is a very talented musician and fine song writer she recently wrote the music and performed a Duet with yuhudi Menuins Son who wrote the lyric for some birthday celebration. My view though is like count Dunkula the boys in Blue and justice system should have far better things to do with their time than policing Thought crime.
Anti Semetism, Islamaphobia, Radical Atheism, Holocaust Research / Climate Denial / Nationalism / Populism/ Mental FacultiesTaboos?Subversion/ Rules for Radicals. Jewish Paedophilia Cannard.