MMT and other hetrodox economic positions discussed, without spitting out of dummies.

        • JohnG February 1, 2016 at 9:01 am # 
          Why are you cluttering up the comments with comments from other blogs?
          I commented on a specific point as per the quoted text.
          Are you always this obtuse?
          You and Wesley haven’t done much bar ad hominem, so heal thyself, you self unaware old goat.
          Yes I have read the articles and yes, as per the comments the writer misunderstands PM’s position.
          I note that, as always, you have not actually responded to my point.
          So don’t be trying to teach me manners you rude ignorant fool.
          You’re as bad as your extremist right wing mate at dissembling and ill mannered intellectual dishonesty.
          • Roger February 1, 2016 at 9:17 am # 
            Johng,
            The comments from the other blogs demonstrate that plenty of other people have discussed MMT and other hetrodox economic positions without spitting out their dummies.
            JohnG there are links to very good analysis of MMT and the various factions around the central position.your interjections are frankly useless.
            You continue to claim that my positions are obtuse or that I am engaging in personal attacks on you personally this is simply not the case.
            I am now at the end of my patience with you John G and this is a personal statement to you. I have nothing further to say to you.
            JohnG February 1, 2016 at 8:03 am #
            returning the power to create new money to an accountable body working in the public interest
            In other words, they’re idiots who, like Roger and Wesley, cannot understand the distinct difference between government money and bank credit.
            These loons think that currency issuing governments borrow their money from banks.
            Why would an anarchist who wants to banish state money and central control promote this undemocratic government and central control by technocrats?
            Loons. Utter loons.
            Your comment
            ”I commented on a specific point as per the quoted text.´´
            Are you always this obtuse?
            Do you seriously expect anyone to engage with that?
            Johng you have lost any respect I could possibly have for your position I am done with you.
          • JohnG February 1, 2016 at 9:30 am # 
            The comments form the other blog demonstrate that plenty of other people have discussed MMT and other hetrodox economic positions wothout spitting out their dummies.
            Yes but they’re not occurring with people like you two are they? You’re not discussing anything.
            Trying to discuss anything with you is like trying to nail jelly to a wall but a lot less fun.
            And yes Roger, it’s damned rude.
            If you’re not being deliberately obtuse, then you must be as thick as mince.
  1. Roger February 1, 2016 at 7:28 pm # 
    A visit to the the new deans office finds a new zeal for MMT, an innocent question or two leads to a diagnosis of opposition defiance disorder blasphemy and dick waddery.
    MMT causes siome strong reactions who would have known?
Share:

Author: rogerglewis

https://about.me/rogerlewis Looking for a Job either in Sweden or UK. Freelance, startups, will turń my hand to anything.

Leave a Reply