France Telecom became Orange in 2017, Trump or Putin must be to blame, Orange being Trump “the Orange one”, lets pin this one on Trump.

Mays NHS promise will be an Establishment thing, she is just the mouthpiece, as a puppet, she will be doing exactly as she is told by now Mike her star no longer shines if it ever did in the first place.

The Establishment will give with one hand take twice as much away with the other, say it has done Brexit when really the UK will be deeper in the Club than ever at the Establishment level if the Establishment has its way which it usually will.

That will only change if sufficient people cotton on and make a fuss which happens very rarely I would say every 50 -100 years maybe even every 150 years. The Changes due and inevitable from the Nixon Shock and Post 2nd world war are 45-2018 – 73 years and 46 years respectively.

The EU breaks up or there is an EU republic declared and those who do not like it will be suppressed, that is what I think is the likely outcome when The next round of financial crisis comes in If the establishment is sufficiently worried that 5% – 25% (figure from your link the other day) will not wear it they will make a short-term sop to get things to calm down, like promise 380 million in 2026 ( Always Jam tomorrow said, Alice,)

At the banking level what needs to be done has been on the radars of those who count since 2009.

Zhou Xiaochuan: Reform the international monetary system

Essay by Dr Zhou Xiaochuan, Governor of the People’s Bank of China, 23 March 2009.

* * *

2. A super-sovereign reserve currency not only eliminates the inherent risks of credit-based
sovereign currency, but also makes it possible to manage global liquidity.
http://www.bis.org/publ/work444.pdf
Reforming the international monetary system in the
The 1970s and 2000s: would an SDR substitution
account have worked?
Robert N McCauley and Catherine R Schenk
1

Read the Brandt Equation and the two BIS links and that is I think where the two main establishment faction views will be found a Bi-Polar or a Uni-Polar authoritarian world. Those of us who are Libertarians will oppose both Establishment positions in favour of Banking reforms and one of the many other ways of skinning the Political Economy Cat.

Series of Quilligan Seminars Here.
https://debategraph.org/Stream.aspx?nid=156721&vt=rgraph&dc=focus

Vis.

or Prouhdon?

Kropotkin in the Encyclopedia Britannica thus.
https://archive.org/stream/…
”Now Proudhon advocated a society without government and
used the word Anarchy to describe it. Proudhon repudiated,
as is known, all schemes of Communism, according to which
mankind would be driven into communistic monasteries or
barracks, as also all the schemes of state or state-aided Socialism
which were advocated by Louis Blanc and the Collectivists. When
he proclaimed in his first memoir on property that ” Property
is theft,” he meant only property in its present, Roman-law,
sense of ” right of use and abuse ” ; in property-rights, on the other
hand, understood in the limited sense of possession, he saw the
best protection against the encroachments of the state. At the
same time, he did not want violently to dispossess the present
owners of land, dwelling-houses, mines, factories and so on. He
preferred to attain the same end by rendering capital incapable
of earning interest; and this he proposed to obtain by means of
a national bank, based on the mutual confidence of all those who
are engaged in production, who would agree to exchange among
themselves their produces at cost-value, by means of labour
cheques representing the hours of labour required to produce
every given commodity. Under such a system, which Proudhon
described as ” Mutuellisme,” all the exchanges of services would be
strictly equivalent. Besides, such a bank would be enabled to
lend money without interest, levying only something like 1 %,
or even less, for covering the cost of administration. Every one
being thus enabled to borrow the money that would be required
to buy a house, nobody would agree to pay any more a yearly
rent for the use of it. A general ” social liquidation ” would
thus be rendered easy, without violent expropriation. The same
applied to mines, railways, factories and so on. ”
Such is, substantially, Socialism’s theory of Capital and Interest.