The world is in the middle of what is likely to be the warmest 10 years since records began in 1850, says the Met Office.
Roger Lewis Phwoar!!! Climate Catastrophe Porn, can´t get enough of it. Climate science discovers the Carbon Cycle, perhaps in another ten years they will actually understand it! Misanthropic propaganda such as this is laughable, extremism and founded in massive ignorance. Calling this scientific is a huge joke the only science it has any relevance to is political Science and the promulgation of fear based propaganda. Urban peasants, so much more sophisticated than we country bumpkins. read this and learn something.
CO2 is a life-giving natural resource, not pollution. Its effect on atmospheric warming actually declines exponentially i.e the effect halves with each doubling. Far from underestimating its effects the IPCC has allowed for its effects to be exaggerated pending more empirical data required to improve the Global Climate models, as the models improve and understanding of the Carbon Cycle improve it is becoming clear that CO2 emissions are perhaps not Man kinds greatest sin, coastal pollution and destroying ecosystems that sequester carbon in those systems may be doing far more harm, meanwhile, Idiot, climate porn addicts continue to cry wolf at a sheep whilst hyenas devour the earth’s ecological diversity.
Roger Lewis Earl your characterisation of what I have posted here as Trolling is plainly not supported by the evidence. CERN is a highly regarded International Scientific collaboration their experiments on cosmic rays reference Sevnsmaerks work. The Biogeosciences papers are also climate science research papers from various climate research groups funded by the EU, NASA and many others supportive of the AGW hypothesis, any honest research science will encounter and publish results which do not support their own hypothesis. You are seeking to trivialise sound and important science that is clarifying the many areas of the AGW hypothesis that the IPCC itself categorises as being less than certain. If you can not engage with the evidence or wish to ignore it then do so but do not make unsupported claims that the existence of the papers has to be straw man argument or that By stating a view that the bottom end of IPCC predictions of Climate change is likely not to be exceeded as some sort of denial of 1. The fact of Climate change and 2. That CO2 is a (Greenhouse) ( would be better described as a quilt) Gas.
Climate change: World heading for warmest decade, says Met Office
352. Posted by Shaker situ, Here are my qualifications based upon reasoned evidence quoting from the scientific literature and what is found in the IPCC reports and not the summaries for policymakers which are political and not scientific.
This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify us immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated.