A greying middle-aged man in a curious tee shirt looks forlornly into the 30 inch Mac screen in his den in rural Sweden. The tee shirt reads “Every one, get back its an asshole” Running Linux on his 13 year old Mac which no longer can run the latest OSX a phenomenal array of computing power surrounds him, he is nervous, long nights of coding and hacking to evade the Cyber Cops could be blown if he reveals too much but the minds of a younger generation needed to know the knowledge he would now be broadcasting.

The Rest of The Video Series is at the end of the links to this video after Hypathia demonstrates the elliptical orbit.

https://steemit.com/hocuspocus/@tonefreqhz/sigma-functions-and-other-hocus-pocus-and-mumbo-jumbo-climate-science-and-notation-of-dynamic-equations

https://clivelord.wordpress.com/2019/02/17/school-strike-breakthrough-or-what/comment-page-1/#comment-2813

at 1.01 Clive That’s you at the meeting in my mind.

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGVIKqbEtdU Greta has certainly raised some interesting questions none of them about the Environment and AGW Global Warming.

 

Let Me Google that for you allows you to send a search for someone to put in their browser, it allows you to tick a recommend box of a particular Browser I recommend Duck a Gogo in this browser, This is relevant to questions like the Settled Seance of Climastrology where you will find it hard to find this debate for instance. This Debate is mentioned in one of my recent talks, Put a search in your browser Try and FInd It, try “Climate Debate” “Debate on Climate”. “Public Debate With Scientists” http://bfy.tw/MLJS there try that Now Try This, http://bfy.tw/MLJY

 

 

let me just walk through it very quickly

30:11

okay there’s not a test dr. Mann would

30:14

get an A everybody else I’m not quite so

30:17

sure including myself so this is when I

30:21

started talking about this into Pentagon

30:23

a decade ago some of my fellow Admirals

30:27

asked me titli have you got religion on

30:29

this and I said no I just went to the

30:30

Church of the radiative transfer

30:32

equation and as dr. Mann kind of pointed

30:35

out we’ve known this stuff for a long

30:37

time so you had Fourier on the far left

30:40

in the 1820s figured out the atmosphere

30:43

effects heat you have Tyndall Ascot he

30:46

actually figured out carbon dioxide was

30:48

in fact a greenhouse gas and by the time

30:51

you got to the close of the 19th century

30:52

had the guy on the right a rain who’s a

30:54

Swede starting to do the first global

30:57

warming calculations

30:58

she had a Frenchman a Scot a Swede as

31:01

far as I know they did not go into a bar

31:02

but they kind of figured this stuff out

31:05

so I say that this is the fundamentals

31:07

of climate certainty so what do the

31:10

observations say

Admiral Titley, is in the running for one of the “Kuhnt Journals” nobbles, at out inaugural dinner in Stockholm, he manages in this short segment of his talk to achieve a combination of logical fallacies worthy of the greatest Dadaist absurdist.

https://www.solarconsultingservices.com/smarts.php

http://claesjohnson.blogspot.com/2015/05/back-radiation-as-physics-of-greenhouse.html

TISDAG 19 MAJ 2015

edX: “Back Radiation” as the Physics of the “Greenhouse Effect”

I started my journey as climate skeptic in 2009 in an attempt to understand the physics of the so called “greenhouse effect” threatening human civilisation by global warming from human emission of CO2 as a powerful “greenhouse gas”.

I then discovered that the “greenhouse effect”was (and still is) is very vaguely identified in the scientific literature which poses a severe difficulty to skepticism of CO2 alarmism.

The ongoing edX course Denial101x Making Sense of Climate Science Denial is an attack on skepticism to CO2 alarmism, referred to as “denialism”, introduced by:

• In this first week you will be introduced to some of the terminology we will use in the course in order to begin building your understanding of scientific consensus, the psychology of denial and the spread of denial. 

The course shows which skeptics arguments are the most effective and thus requires special effort to kill. In this sense the course offers valuable insight. In a video lecture in week 3 on the “Greenhouse Effect”, we are informed that:

• The glow from the Earth surface goes upwards, greenhouse gasses absorb some of this heat and they then glow in every direction including down towards us. 
• This is how the greenhouse effect works. We measure it every day here at Reading Atmospheric Obervatory by a pyrgeometer…it has a special window only allowing infrared light through to be measured. Even during a cloudless night it measures the constant greenhouse glow. 
• Even though the greenhouse effect is an observed fact, there is a myth that it does not exist. This myth misinterprets a law of physics called the second law of thermodynamics. The 2nd law says that even though heat moves in all directions, overall heat moves from hot to cold, and not from cold to hot. 
• The myth says that the greenhouse effect does not exist because it means heat moving from a cooler sky to warmer surface. But this is a misrepresentation: The greenhouse effect obeys the law: A square meter of Earth surface send about 500 Watts upwards, so it works like a 500 W heater. The greenhouse effect sends down about 330 Watts of heat, so in total about 170 Watts goes from the warmer surface to the cooler sky. Heat overall goes from hot to cold  but the greenhouse effect sends som back to warm us up.
• The myth misrepresents the 2nd law. Meanwhile observatories measures the greenhouse effect every day all over the globe.

We understand that the “greenhouse effect” is based on “back radiation” from the atmosphere, which is measured by pyrgeometers.

From the beginning of my skeptics journey I understood, from a new proof of Planck’s radiation I had constructed as part of a larger effort to describe physics as analog computation,  that “back radiation” is an illusion without physical reality, and so that a pyrgeometer is constructed to sell this illusion to a market in need of “instrumental evidence”.