The Tragic events and a terrorist acts carried out in Christchurch Are condemned outright.
This blog examines the sub-text of the narrative surrounding The Christchurch mosque shootings were two consecutive white supremacist terrorist attacks at Al Noor Mosque and the Linwood Islamic Centre in Christchurch, New Zealand, during Friday prayers on 15 March 2019
The context is the Brezinski policy as follows.
THE ULTIMATE OBJECTIVE OF AMERICAN POLICY SHOULD BE BENIGN AND VISIONARY: TO SHAPE A TRULY COOPERATIVE GLOBAL COMMUNITY, IN KEEPING WITH LONG-RANGE TRENDS AND WITH THE FUNDAMENTAL INTERESTS OF HUMANKIND. BUT IN THE MEANTIME, IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT NO EURASIAN CHALLENGER EMERGES, CAPABLE OF DOMINATING EURASIA AND THUS ALSO OF CHALLENGING AMERICA. THE FORMULATION OF A COMPREHENSIVE AND INTEGRATED EURASIANGEOSTRATEGY IS THEREFORE THE PURPOSE OF THIS BOOK” (ITALICIZED BY Z. BRZEZINSKI) («THE GRAND CHESSBOARD», P.12, DATED: APRIL 1997).
And of course the War of Civilisations which is a deep state Egrogor Matrix construct.
“Tarrant, is lionizing Trump at the same moment that Trump himself is surrounded by the Zionist neo-conservative wing of power in the West…
“The Zionist neo-conservative wing of power in the West created this entire clash of civilizations with their false flag mind-controlled operation of September 11, 2001 that was designed to inculcate inter-generational Islamophobia.”
false flag op / Bernard Lewis: one of the secret rulers of the world?
The original Brenton Tarrant seems to have disappeared sometime after 2011?
The ‘spooky Brenton Tarrant’ says he’s not an antisemite, and adds that “a Jew living in Israel is no enemy of mine”.
Clash of Civilizations
|Author||Samuel P. Huntington|
|Publisher||Simon & Schuster|
The Clash of Civilizations is a hypothesis that people’s cultural and religious identities will be the primary source of conflict in the post-Cold War world. The American political scientist Samuel P. Huntington argued that future wars would be fought not between countries, but between cultures. It was proposed in a 1992 lecture at the American Enterprise Institute, which was then developed in a 1993 Foreign Affairs article titled “The Clash of Civilizations?”, in response to his former student Francis Fukuyama‘s 1992 book, The End of History and the Last Man. Huntington later expanded his thesis in a 1996 book The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order.
The phrase itself was earlier used by Albert Camus in 1946, by Girilal Jain in his analysis of the Ayodhya dispute in 1988, by Bernard Lewis in an article in the September 1990 issue of The Atlantic Monthly titled “The Roots of Muslim Rage”and by Mahdi El Mandjra in his book “La première guerre civilisationnelle” published in 1992. Even earlier, the phrase appears in a 1926 book regarding the Middle East by Basil Mathews: Young Islam on Trek: A Study in the Clash of Civilizations (p. 196). This expression derives from “clash of cultures”, already used during the colonial period and the Belle Époque.
Huntington began his thinking by surveying the diverse theories about the nature of global politics in the post-Cold War period. Some theorists and writers argued that human rights, liberal democracy, and the capitalist free market economy had become the only remaining ideological alternative for nations in the post-Cold War world. Specifically, Francis Fukuyama argued that the world had reached the ‘end of history‘ in a Hegelian sense.
Huntington believed that while the age of ideology had ended, the world had only reverted to a normal state of affairs characterized by cultural conflict. In his thesis, he argued that the primary axis of conflict in the future will be along cultural lines.As an extension, he posits that the concept of different civilizations, as the highest rank of cultural identity, will become increasingly useful in analyzing the potential for conflict. At the end of his 1993 Foreign Affairs article, “The Clash of Civilizations?”, Huntington writes, “This is not to advocate the desirability of conflicts between civilizations. It is to set forth descriptive hypothesis as to what the future may be like.”
In addition, the clash of civilizations, for Huntington, represents a development of history. In the past, world history was mainly about the struggles between monarchs, nations and ideologies, such as seen within Western civilization. But after the end of the Cold War, world politics moved into a new phase, in which non-Western civilizations are no longer the exploited recipients of Western civilization but have become additional important actors joining the West to shape and move world history.
So from there, we need to go to Chechnya and the problems The Russian Federation has with Meddling in its internal affairs.
“Jihad” means “holy war” when translated from the Arabic. Essentially it means that the followers of God’s kingdom upon Earth are forced to defend themselves, their families and allies because murder is a sin. But murder is a smaller sin than impiety brought in openly or indirectly by the enemies of those who forcedly resorted to Jihad.1
But what is going on in Chechnya is not Jihad. It is a pseudo-Jihad.
If one turns to the history of how one of the world’s regional civilisations developed its culture on the basis of Koran’s revelation one notices that before the prophet Muhammad started a Jihad he spent ten years preaching peacefully. During that time:
On the one hand, all opponents of Muhammad and his first followers had every chance of getting to know the revelation of Koran, delving into its meaning and thinking about their personal attitude to the Revelation and their personal relationship to God ( this is what religion actually is). As a result some of them adopted Islam according to their personal understanding of good and evil, benefits to the community.
On the other hand, first Muslims themselves were firm in enduring everything their opponents used against them – conspiracy and violence amounting to murders including attempts to assassinate Muhammad
1 On the problem of Islam’s attitude to the world see the Koran, sura 2:212.
amounting to murders including attempts to assassinate Muhammad himself, hunger and economic genocide caused by a trade boycott organised by the clan leaders of Islam’s opponents.
And only after that did they start the Jihad which resulted in the complete defeat of their enemy. Taking precedent into consideration had Chechnya started a true Jihad then Chechen leaders themselves would have put an end to the train-robbing “business”. The same goes to the issue of taking hostages for ransom or slavery.
And every Russian citizen when recollecting those thousands people reported missing who were actually turned into slavery and those of their countrymen who died in acts of terror, would hardly recollect a single person whom the Chechens did convert in true Islam, so that this person by all his life would act as a credible example of a righteous man of God. Although there are several examples of people converted into the historically real type of Islam, the type of thoughtless worshipping – and supporters of usurious slavery immediately grabbed the opportunity, turning that fact to their advantage in the movie “Musulmanin” (“The Muslim”).
WORLD GOVERNANCE UNENTANGLED IN TWEETS.EGREGORE (ALSO EGREGOR) IS AN OCCULT CONCEPT REPRESENTING A “THOUGHTFORM” OR “COLLECTIVE GROUP MIND”, PART 1 & 2
( see Erica Chenoweth’s Work),
Dylan Roof is the innocent ‘patsy’ linked to Sandy Hook, Elliot Rodger and the Hunger Games.
The aim of ‘Dylann Roof’s manifesto’ is to get the American public to turn to the military, the police and the security services for protection.
THE REAL ANDERS BREIVIK is an innocent patsy.
“The alleged ‘shooter manifesto’ has some USA spelling, as a USA Yank or Israeli would use … would not someone from Oz – NZ be using standard UK-type English?
“There are odd elements of apparent humour / satire / sarcasm in it, as if intel agents are having a laugh at us.”
Sam Clarke, a reporter with TVNZ, told Al Jazeera that ‘the gunman’ had a machine gun.
“A gunman – dressed in black with a helmet carrying a machine gun – came into the back of the mosque and started firing into the people praying there,” said Clarke, according to Al Jazeera.
Brenton Tarrant: 5 Fast Facts
Israel has been busy.
Any Right Wing Nut Job who has read Breivikś weighty tome or struggles through The Alleged 73 pages mini-me version form the extant outrages should perhaps read Quiggleys Tragedy and Hope, or Coup d’etat in Slow Motion Vol II: The murder of Olof Palme .
Or watch the lecture at the top of this blog.
Christchurch Terrorist Manifesto