Dominic Raab Confirms changes in Chequers deal appeared after his signing off the draft? See from 2.11 mins
02:11
election who authorized that it’s not
02:13
clear to me I’ve asked that question as
02:15
a change made that if it wasn’t you and
02:17
you’re the
02:17
secretary paid to be the negotiator the
02:19
brexit said we can only have been the
02:21
Prime Minister well I don’t know I asked
02:22
that question in cabinet I haven’t had a
02:23
particular good answers it was described
02:26
as a drafting change but I think if you
02:27
look at it you’ve got it there in front
02:28
of you it is very clear that the future
02:31
relationship will be based on this
02:33
Steve Baker makes the same point in his detailed evidence to the Brexit committee.
On the Coming Censorship, Beating the Memory Hole and the Ban Stick!
Steve Baker evidence to European Scrutiny Committee 30 01 19 14 30 53
I would say to you is that it’s
59:57
very clear that David Davis was leading
59:59
a process within the department for
60:01
exiting the EU which I participated in
60:03
of preparing our white paper which
60:05
correspond it to our policy choices yet
60:07
and that with five days notice I think
60:09
was his evidence to you he was presented
60:12
with a different white paper which came
60:13
out and checkers so it’s very clear that
60:16
the policy developed and presented at
60:19
Chequers was substantially different to
60:21
our forces and who in your view had put
60:26
together and written those pre agreed
60:30
pre-written not agreed of checkers but
60:33
already proof written and reduced
60:34
sections of that one thing sorry you
60:37
mean the government the checkers white
60:38
man so that the checkers paper that the
60:42
phrase they use is holding the pen so
60:43
the pen was held for the checkers white
60:46
paper by the Cabinet Office Europe unit
60:48
and the Secretary of State’s was holding
60:52
the pen for our version of the white
60:54
paper but of course the drafts are all
60:55
produced by officials it does raise the
60:57
question which I cannot answer of
61:00
whether officials which would be very
61:02
unfair on them whether officials were
THERESA MAYS, ACT OF TREASON. SELLING BRITAIN INTO EU SLAVERY AND SURRENDERING OUR DEFENCES TO THE EU TYRANNY.
DUPLICITOUS LEADERS
THIS IS A COPY OF THE BLOG POST ON THE BRUGES GROUP WEBSITE, WHICH HAS VERY QUICKLY BEEN TAKEN DOWN. I AM HOSTING IT HERE SIMPLY FOR VISIBILITY. I MAKE NO CLAIMS ABOUT ITS ACCURACY.
There is no doubt about the veracity of this account since documents have been seen.
On Monday July 9th 2018, several leading French, German and Dutch senior managers were called by EU officials to an urgent meeting.
The meeting was said to be private and those present were informed that Prime Minister May and Chancellor Merkel had reached an Agreement over Brexit. Knowledge of this was attained from the actual transcript of the meeting between May and Merkel.
1) The Agreement was couched in a way to ‘appease’ the Brexit voters.
2) The Agreement would enable May to get rid of those people in her party who were against progress and unity in the EU.
3) Both Merkel and May agreed that the likely course of events would be that UK would re-join the EU in full at some time after the next general election.
4) May agreed to keep as many EU laws and institutions as she could despite the current groundswell of ‘anti-EU hysteria’ in Britain (May’s own words, apparently.)
5) Merkel and May agreed that the only realistic future for the UK was within the EU.
The original Agreement draft was completed in May 2018 in Berlin and then sent to the UK Government Cabinet Office marked ‘Secret’.
NB This Agreement draft was authored in the German Chancellor’s private office.
The Cabinet returned the Agreement draft with suggestions, and there was some to-ing and fro-ing during June 5th 2018.
Private calls between the Prime Minister and Chancellor were made.
The Agreement’s final draft came out late in June 2018. The German Chancellor told Prime Minister May that this was a deal she would support, though there would need to be some more small concessions by the UK to keep the EU happy.
The Chancellor and Prime Minister met in Germany. Merkel had this meeting recorded as a ‘private meeting’ though the Prime Minister was probably unaware of that.
The Chancellor had the transcript of that meeting circulated secretly to EU and key German embassies.
Conclusions
Documents make it quite clear that Prime Minister May was negotiating with Germany, not the EU.
The transcript also makes it clear that the Prime Minister intended to keep all this secret from minsters, especially the Brexit group.
She wants to keep as many EU institutions in UK as intact as possible in order to facilitate an easy return to the EU after 2020.
Chancellor Merkel briefed May on tactics to force Cabinet approval.
The Prime Minister and senior civil servants were working with Germany to stop Brexit or water it down to prevent free trade and the ending of freedom of movement, but to keep cash flowing to the EU.
David Davis was kept in the dark while key EU premiers in France, Holland and Ireland were briefed in full.
Key EU heads were actually briefed in full the day before the Cabinet meeting at Chequers.
PUBLISHED BY ROGERGLEWIS
Interesting, very interesting!