Interesting this one John. On internet forums, there is a thing called necroposting, the commercial sites who hate politics and keep a strong control on their memberships to keep them in the product worship buying reflex hypnotic state, absolutely hate necro posting which is always a banning offence. Narratives out of context reveal a great deal and as such cause huge cognitive dissonance. I happen to agree with what you have written here Assange is I think part of a larger wider and longer narrative plot line which fits into the Rovian actors in History mould. https://longhairedmusings.wordpress.com/2017/04/11/trump-netenyahu-greater-israel-and-the-rove-train-actors-in-history-were-an-empire-now-and-when-we-act-we-create-our-own-reality/
This morning, the Washington Post has run a story claiming that Wikileaks founder is about to be charged with espionage. But first of all, they have to find the real Julian Assange.
I have only two questions in relation to the Wikileaks saga – and they’re the same two questions I had at the outset: first, are many people surprised by what’s been revealed? And second, is Julian Assange just a self-aggrandising exhibitionist, or something more sinister?
I have to say that, based on the evidence to hand, there’s not a great deal in the Wikileaks incontinence that isn’t already either known or assumed.
This from a Ukrainian site in 2008 on the subject of Gadaffi:
‘When the leader sleeps, the soldier stays awake, and it’s the women who do the fighting. Gaddafi trusts his security to ladies only. The head of the Libyan Jamahiriya has a total of 300-400…
View original post 1,169 more words
