https://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2018/03/16/opinion-trump-to-fire-mcmaster-russia-to-nuke-america-putin-hated-by-everyone/#comment-738634

Showing the way out of the bottle, Wittgenstein or Epictetus?

The New World Order Paradigm Shift. #GrubStreetJournal #HypatiasEyebrowser #ConquestofDough The End of Debt or the End of Democracy?

 rogerglewis  Uncategorized  October 10, 2019 11 Minutes

I noticed this exchange in the off guardian discussion about the #DumberandDouma false Flag attempted half baked Casus Belli.
What is the direction of travel and the main narrative embedded in the Narrative of the past 40 years? The Rules-Based International Order or ( New World Order ) Narratives.

1. Globalisation and Urbanisation.
2.PetroDollar Hegemony. Addiction to Oil.

3. Man-Made Global Warming

4. Overshoot Overpopulation
5. Elitism, Starfucking worship of ”The Elites**

p.34

Chapter 3—Europe’s Shift to the Twentieth Century.

While Europe’s traits were diffusing outward to the non-European world, Europe was

also undergoing profound changes and facing difficult choices at home. These choices

were associated with drastic changes, in some cases we might say reversals, of Europe’s

point of view. These changes may be examined under eight headings. The nineteenth

century was marked by

(1) belief in the innate goodness of man;

(2) secularism;

(3) belief in progress;

(4) liberalism;

(5) capitalism;

(6) faith in science;

(7) democracy;

(8) nationalism. In general, these eight factors went along together in the nineteenth century.

They were generally regarded as being compatible with one another; the friends of one

were generally the friends of the others; the enemies of one were generally the

enemies of the rest.

Metternich and De Maistre were generally opposed to all eight;

Thomas Jefferson and John Stuart Mill were generally in favor of all eight..

https://notthegrubstreetjournal.com/2017/03/28/globalisation-un-entangled-a-found-poem-cipher-of-globalism/

A TRILOGY IN FOUR PARTS.

USURY HELL´S FUEL MANS OPPRESSOR

BOURGOISE RESOLUTION AND 

GLOBALISATION UN ENTANGLED.

the idea before it was clothed in words

heard in minds, as uttered thought

the communication of arranged ideas

Thoughts lifting mist from the poet´s page.

To set the stage, not in the round

but, to see the scene in the sphere

Which actors will the playwright lay

on the page´s narrative to steer.

Which course to meet

who to set upon the bridge

For strength of Bulls Wall Street

of Bears & onion domes upon our chart

A heroes pride found in Britannia’s isles

Monks ´´sans humilite´´ fane ease

Like Pope we find our actors

´´All, all alike, find reason on their side´´

mais par impatience de souffrir

On the present discontents, Burke opined

Putin ,Trump and Farage set courses un-entangled

Junker , Merkel, Call for straight ahead.

Few are the partisans of departed tyranny

of Globalism or Nationalism which be the tyrant?

Yet passions are deceiving someone,
so near 50 years behindhand a hero fell.

“On this day, the day of March

in my opinion´´, is the end of the

United States of America

as the land of the free

and the home of the brave.”

Eliza with Rogerian inscrutability

hears the confession of the mal-contents

A mirror held up before cosmetic application

Globalisation and Internationalism confused

despotism´s nature is to abhor any say

save that of its own momentary pleasure;

it annihilates all intermediate situations

between boundless strength on its own part,

and total debility on the part of the people.

Our education can be Our? our, government.
Our reason can be our Judge, of the rivals;
Globalism, Authority, coercion and competition.

or Nationalism, Internationalism, Cooperation.

Are we to have free will and democracy

Will we have determined authority

A struggle of ideals an ancient quarrel

Parmenides or Heraclitus navigators both

If centuries be epochs with peculiar discretion

19th, 20th, 21st a behind hand review

19^th innate goodness of man, nationalism

20^th Fallen man Calvinist rule, Globalism.

For the 21^st partisans for patronage

https://steemit.com/love/@tonefreqhz/speakers-corner-dialogue-a-messy-and-loud-process-jusitce-what-love-looks-like-in-public

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib46iEq1-UQ

https://theconquestofdough.weebly.com/on-the-chronology-of-human-society.html

“if you are digging up history. You have to dig it all up. If they dig up 60 years , I will dig up 600. If we go back far enough in the history. Always, there will be some grievance, and I´ll fight on him, I´ll fight on you, I´ll fight on everyone. Where is the beginning? I cannot find it?
Dig up all the problems and you will find they have a root cause in one place: Greed. Where there is greed, there is no satisfaction”
Guru Guruji, Quoted from “Towards” Unity by
Stuart Hastings.
​http://towardsunity.org:80/the-kumbh-mela/

​´´every living thing can become healthy, strong and fruitful only within a horizon; if it is incapable of
drawing a horizon around itself or, on the other hand, too selfish to
restrict its vision to the limits of a horizon drawn by another, it will wither
away feebly or overhastily to its early demise. Cheerfulness, clear conscience,
the carefree deed, faith in the future, all this depends   in the case of an individual as well as of a people, on there being a line which  distinguishes what is clear and in full view from the dark and unilluminable; it depends on one’s being able to forget at the right time as
well as to remember at the right time; on discerning with strong instinctual
feelings when there is need to experience historically and when unhistorically.
Precisely this is the proposition the reader is invited to consider:
the unhistorical and the historical are equally necessary for the health of
an individual, a people and a culture. ”
Friedrich Nietzsche: 1844-1900
ON THE ADVANTAGE AND DISADVANTAGEOF HISTORY FOR LIFE