Sane people at the next election will vote Tory where the Tory candidate can win. In old Labour seats where Brexit has a chance – vote Brexit. In seats where there is a choice between Labour and Lib Dems vote Lib Dem. Don’t let sentiment influence. Marxist Labour must be stopped.

— Mike Yardley (@YardleyShooting) November 4, 2019

The battle in this election is clear it’s between Boris Johnson Billionaire Etonian Tory Elite v Nana and Grandad v an abandoned country v 4.8M children living in poverty
Stop Boris Trump 🛑
Vote Labour 🌹
Vote for Nana and Grandad!!
Vote Another World is Possible
🌍🐝🌈🦊🦋 pic.twitter.com/l1UuDXTLDX

— ARTIST TAXI DRIVER (@chunkymark) November 4, 2019

Definitely not a quasi-religious death cult. Absolutely not. No, sirreee. https://t.co/lxOQX3MwvV

— Julia Hartley-Brewer (@JuliaHB1) November 3, 2019

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

rogerglewis Uncategorized May 27, 2019 7 Minutes

Renault.. Plus ça change, plus ça vende la même chose SEXY FORM TO PROMOTIONATE SELL CARS

The absurdity of a proxy election being analysed; with incomplete data and extrapolated to future events, regarding constitutional matters perhaps even of life and death and war and peace. When the body to which the elected people are to be sent is a toothless sheen of lipstick upon the fascist Pig which is the EU, and a flawed institution from which the electorate has already voted to secede from is perhaps reflected in the low turnout in the UK this time again, and historically.

Perhaps what it really tells us is the people who choose not to vote are actually the more articulate, why participate in what is only really a show, a pretence designed merely to give some sort of legitimacy to something with no democratic legitimacy what so ever.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_European_Parliament_election

Parliament to host world’s largest exercise in transnational democracy

Pressmeddelande

On Sunday, the European Parliament will be transformed into a big media hub where around 1,300 journalists will follow and report from the elections.

“The media interest for these elections has been much higher than for previous elections. We never had so many journalists registered for the election night. This clearly demonstrates the growing importance of this trans-national democratic exercise, which is unique in the world” said Jaume Duch, spokesperson of the European Parliament mentioning also the more than 200 journalists coming from non-EU countries, including 54 from the US and 21 from Japan and 20 from China.

The Appearance of Democracy must be seen to be done?

“the hemicycle has been equipped with 110 TV stand-up positions – of which 55 positions in the chamber, 45 live positions for radio stations”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2019_United_Kingdom_general_election

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_United_Kingdom_general_election

United Kingdom general election debates, 2010

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gordon Brown Labour	David Cameron Conservative	Nick Clegg Liberal Democrats
	2010	2015 debates →

The United Kingdom general election debates of 2010 consisted of a series of three leaders’ debates between the leaders of the three main parties contesting the 2010 United Kingdom general election: Gordon Brown, Prime Minister and leader of the Labour Party; David Cameron, Leader of the Opposition and Conservative Party; and Nick Clegg, leader of the third largest political party in the UK, the Liberal Democrats. They were the first such debates to be broadcast live in the run-up to a UK election.

The debates ran without a break for 90 minutes and were broadcast weekly by ITV, BSkyB and the BBC over three successive Thursday evenings starting on 15 April. They were moderated by Alastair Stewart, Adam Boulton and David Dimbleby respectively. The first half of each debate focused on a particular theme (domestic, international and economic affairs), before general issues were discussed. The questions were not disclosed to the leaders before the debate.

In addition to the leaders’ debates, on 29 March, the three main parties’ financial spokesmen participated in a debate focusing on the economy, with the Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling debating with the Shadow Chancellor George Osborne and Liberal Democrats’ Treasury spokesman Vince Cable on Channel 4. Debates also took place between 19 April and 5 May, a series of debates also took place on the BBC political TV series The Daily Politics, between members of the incumbent Labour Cabinet and their Conservative, Liberal Democrat counterparts and representatives from the Green Party, the Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru and the UK Independence Party.

Debates were also held in Scotland and Wales and Northern Ireland, due to the devolved nature of various aspects of government in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. In Scotland and Wales, representatives of three main parties were joined by respective nationalist party representatives who stand MPs only in Scotland and Wales, while in Northern Ireland, due to the main parties having no seats, debates were held between the four largest Northern Irish parties. The arrangements for the UK-wide leaders debates were criticised for being restricted to the main UK parties excluding other national minor parties and nationalist parties in Scotland and Wales, for covering many domestic matters which are devolved from Westminster, and also for being held in three locations solely in England.

http://tagcrowd.com/pdf/1495187362_cloud.pdf

absolutely (25) agree (38) answer (28) audience (25) banks (89) believe (33) billion (27) bring (27) britain (42) businesses (54) change (69) children (26) comes (38) conservative (57) controls (27) country (151) course (40) credits (44) cut (95) deal (42) debate (41) decisions (30) difference (49) done (41) economy (82) education (31) election (48) energy (25) europe (48) european (42) fair (28) future (47) give (54) going (108) government (71) happened (41) help (36) house (51) immigration (54) important (25) investment (36) issue (25) jobs (86) keep (36) labour (33) leader (32) liberal (28) lords (24) lots (29) making (25) manufacturing (25) million (27) money (95) national (32) nuclear (25) number (33) party (76) pay (56) people (249) point (39) police (50) politicians (26) politics (57) power (35) problem (38) public (39) question (95) really (40) recovery (29) regional (25) responsibility (25) risk (33) save (41) saying (46) schools (58) services (31) something (34) spending (36) start (36) stop (39) support (47) sure (55) system (56) talking (42) tax (157) teachers (27) thank (31) things (70) think (206) together (26) union (34) vote (31) wants (33) waste (34) week (24) work (81) world (37) wrong (31) years (111) young (27)

created at TagCrowd.com

United Kingdom general election debates, 2015

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

David Cameron Conservative	Ed Miliband Labour	Nick Clegg Liberal Democrats
Nigel Farage UKIP	Natalie Bennett GPEW	Nicola Sturgeon SNP
	Leanne Wood Plaid Cymru
← 2010 debates	2015	2017 debates →

The term “United Kingdom general election debates” of 2015 refers to a series of four live television programmes featuring the main political party leaders that took place in March/April 2015 in the run-up to the general election. After various prior proposals and arguments over which parties should be represented,[1][2] there was a single debate between the leaders of seven British parties:[3]

• David Cameron, Prime Minister (Conservative Party)
• Ed Miliband, Leader of the Opposition (Labour Party)
• Nick Clegg, Deputy Prime Minister (Liberal Democrats)
• Nigel Farage (UKIP)
• Natalie Bennett (Green Party of England and Wales)
• Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister of Scotland (SNP)
• Leanne Wood (Plaid Cymru)

There was a second debate involving the “challengers”, those in the above list who were not members of the outgoing coalition government. There were also two programmes – one with Cameron and Miliband; one with Cameron, Miliband and Clegg – in which the leaders answered questions but did not debate head-to-head.

Following the result of the election, a survey of 3,019 people, carried out by Panelbase, found that 38% of voters considered the debates to have influenced their voting intention.[4][5]

http://tagcrowd.com/pdf/1495187430_cloud.pdf

austerity (11) balance (12) believe (16) benefits (13) bennett (17) better (17) billion (23) britain (23)build (17) care (17) change (22) control (15) country (51) create (13) cuts (40) deal (13) debate (22)debt (19) decisions (12) economy (18) ed (17) education (20) election (14) end (15) eu (14) europe (17)european (16) fair (14) family (15) free (17) full (12) future (22) generation (19) give (16) going (26)government (19) happens (12) health (17) help (25) home (23) host (16) hours (11) house (21)immigration (43) important (13) invest (16) issue (19) jobs (28) labor (20) leaders (19) living (22) lot (13)miliband (37) million (17) minister (26) money (21) mr (54) national (13) needs (11) nhs (29) nick (12)nigel (13) open (13) parliament (12) party (37) pay (28) people (126) plan (24) point (13) politics (12)pounds (34) prime (28) private (14) problem (13) promise (12) public (19) question (21) schools (17)services (28) social (14) speaker (74) spending (18) sturgeon (12) sure (16) system (16) talk (18) tax (20)thank (34) things (16) think (42) tonight (16) tuition (11) university (12) vote (22) wage (14) wales (17)work (38) world (15) years (41) young (30)

created at TagCrowd.com

United Kingdom general election, 2017

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

United Kingdom general election, 2017

← 2015 8 June 2017 2022 →
← outgoing members
All 650 seats in the House of Commons 326 seats needed for a majority
Opinion polls
Leader Theresa May Jeremy Corbyn Party Conservative Labour Leader since 11 July 2016 12 September 2015 Leader’s seat Maidenhead Islington North Last election 330 seats, 36.9% 232 seats, 30.4% Current seats 330 229 Seats needed  97 Leader Nicola Sturgeon Tim Farron Party SNP Liberal Democrat Leader since 14 November 2014 16 July 2015 Leader’s seat Not contesting[n 1] Westmorland & Lonsdale Last election 56 seats, 4.7% 8 seats, 7.9% Current seats 54 9 Seats needed N/A[n 2]  317
A map of UK parliamentary constituencies.
Incumbent Prime Minister Theresa May Conservative

2005 election • MPs

2010 election • MPs

2015 election • MPs

2017 election • MPs

The United Kingdom general election of 2017 is scheduled to take place on 8 June 2017. Each of the 650 parliamentary constituencies will elect one Member of Parliament (MP) to the House of Commons, the lower house of Parliament.

In line with the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011, an election had not been due until 7 May 2020, but a call for a snap election by Prime Minister Theresa May received the necessary two-thirds majority in a 522 to 13 vote in the House of Commons on 19 April 2017.

The Conservative Party, which has governed since 2015 (and as a senior coalition partner from 2010), is defending a majority of 12 against the Labour Party, the official opposition. The third largest party, the Scottish National Party, won 56 of the 59 Scottish constituencies in 2015. The Liberal Democrats, and the Northern Irish Democratic Unionist Party, are the fourth and fifth largest parties, with 9 and 8 seats respectively.

Negotiation positions following Britain’s invocation of Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union in March 2017 to leave the EU are expected to dominate the election campaign. Opinion polling for the popular vote since the election was called has given May’s Conservatives a significant lead over Labour led by Jeremy Corbyn.

12345

http://tagcrowd.com/pdf/1495187524_cloud.pdf

absolutely (17) away (16) believe (24) benefits (17) best (31) better (17) billion (25) brexit (31)bring (16) britain (16) budget (15) build (26) care (52) children (38) choice (15) class (18)comes (18) cost (17) country (62) course (21) cuts (16) deal (41) economy (31) education (37)election (31) end (17) european (28) extreme (16) free (30) future (37) generation (18)give (29) going (52) government (29) green (22) health (45) help (15) housing (41)immigration (21) important (22) increase (16) invest (16) issue (37) jobs (38) leader (34)leave (31) life (21) living (31) lot (16) lucas (23) market (23) million (16) moment (23)money (51) national (24) nhs (45) okay (27) party (43) paul (30) pay (33) people (175)plan (24) point (43) pounds (37) private (17) public (22) question (45) real (22) really (26)schools (62) scotland (37) sector (19) service (45) simply (16) single (32) social (45)stand (16) support (20) sure (40) system (23) talking (26) tax (17) teachers (49) thank (85)things (22) think (64) tim (18) today (15) tonight (28) tories (17) uk (24) union (27)university (18) values (17) vote (51) wage (22) work (45) world (16) year (62) young (41)

created at TagCrowd.com

Get involved in our attempt to track #GE2019 campaigns targeting you.

Here @faisalislam & I explain how to help: 2 simple screenshots from your Facebook feed👇🏾

1. The ad
2. “why am i seeing this?”
& if you can hometown/ constituency send to Election.ads@bbc.co.uk
Thanks! pic.twitter.com/mv66tFWJ8h

— Rory Cellan-Jones (@ruskin147) November 2, 2019

Twitter is banning political ads – and in any case the parties spend very little on it

— Rory Cellan-Jones (@ruskin147) November 3, 2019

@YardleyShooting https://t.co/zj0hPd5LhJ

— Wiki_Ballot (@wiki_ballot) November 4, 2019

https://t.co/Afn1bqlU2g— Wiki_Ballot (@wiki_ballot) November 4, 2019 https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

https://t.co/KDWjsBEZ3l— Wiki_Ballot (@wiki_ballot) November 4, 2019 https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

SO LITTLE HAS CHANGED. HAS EVERYTHING CHANGED?

What is the direction of travel and the main narrative embedded in the Narrative of the past 40 years? The Rules-Based International Order or ( New World Order ) Narratives.

1. Globalisation and Urbanisation.

2.Petro Dollar Hegemony. Addiction to Oil.

3. Man Made Global Warming

4. Overshoot Overpopulation

5. Elitism, Starfucking worship of ”The Elites** Submission to Judgement by Experts?

https://notthegrubstreetjournal.com/2018/04/04/wwiii-is-nothing-but-another-colonial-resource-war/

Hierarchy and Fascism – How the Ruling Few are Destroying Democracy By Michele Goddard       (Page 1 of 4 pages)     (# of views)   4 comments

IMG_1415
(Image by GGAADD)   Details   DMCA

Most people of course will recite the “life liberty and the pursuit of happiness” when asked what they recall of the document but mine would be the lines that follow:

“That to secure these rights governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed…”

This says everything. Our rights are unalienable. And the only purpose of government is to secure these rights.

So why is it, how is it, that government is the very thing which we find ourselves defending against its tyranny?