WHO Knows best . Who nose? Sniffy comments and Whiffy narratives. He who smelt it dwelt it. Fart Science Edit. For IPCC funding submission.


NWO: Why we’re still far from defeating fascism on the Left in every State from Brussels to BrisbaneThe same mentality that cannot accept the idea of the EU as a force behind totalitarianism is the same one that believed things could only get better under Tony Blair – and now believes jabs, masks and lockdowns that don’t work are the Big Dandy Things we should all get behind. From Arkansas to Australia, our chief enemy remains blind belief.

rogerglewis on October 4, 2021 at 8:11 am
Your comment is awaiting moderation.

I posted this long comment in a Blog I read regularly. GolemXIV is a Lighthouse for me which I trust to navigate through the Smoke and Interference of Mainstream and other subjective scripts on the purpose and direction of World and Domestic affairs.


Roger November 17, 2012 at 7:31 am

I have read the recent articles and the extent of and quality of analysis available here on Davids site coupled with the reference links of the many active and visiting contributors point to an ever-clearer picture of the Money Elite problem.
Many here have studied these subjects in great depth, we all have been impacted by the system and have our own experiences of its Bounties and punishments. I remain frustrated as to how one combats the indifference, fear and denial that remains as the outward and admitted perceptions of many people.
I have read often here of others encountering the eyes of their friends glazing over and the uncomfortable impression given “Oh please not that again´´.
I have tried through writing songs and participating in other areas from my Hobbies of Music and philosophy to get into the mindset of my peer groups and so forth and introduce new angles and perspectives. I have been banned from the Economics Group of the Economist In Linked in, I have been banned from the My Les Paul Guitar Forum and also from the Gibson Forums. I have not been rude or aggressive or even overtly political I have merely refused to conform to the apathetic stance or subscribed to the acceptable Line. ´´I saw a swallow once and summer is upon us always.
The challenge is to increasingly break the hypnotic spell. I have spent several hours reading up on the psychology of group dynamics.
This essay particularly. ( and Wikipedia and various other references pointed to there).

Davids Blog is currently offline, I mentioned it to him a few weeks back.
David stopped writing when it became clear that over the cycle of the blog it had become possible just to replay on a loop all that had already been written and discussed at length.
The Narcissism of Small Differences. In Group Bias.

The Narcissism of Small Differences. In Group Bias.

JW (The Slog) has been at this blogging lark longer than David stuck it and my own Blog remains what it has always been for me, a cathartic therapy.

Tony Gosling has been at it a long time too.

Labour Leader Keir Starmer’s ‘Beauty Of Work’ Slogan Was Copied From NSDAP 1930s Nazi Propaganda – The 2021 Labour Conference Charade With Leader Keir Starmer An Assange Condemning, Savile Protecting Puppet Of The Deep State – Road Protest Veteran On Fundamental Flaws At The Heart Of XR Front, ‘Insulate Britain’ – Killer Cop Wayne Couzens Protected While Good Cop Tony Roach Was Sacked: Criminals Running Met And S. Wales Police Professional Standards Departments, PCCs Integral To Criminal Conspiracy Too – Hinkley C Project Nurse Ligia Voica Allegedly Sexually Assaulted At Work Then Forced Out By Her ‘Barry Mafia’ DEME Boss – NOT The BCfm Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling

This is the kind of disagreement open-minded people thrive upon.
Niavety is a 360° human problem.

There endeth the lesson.

rogerglewis on October 4, 2021 at 7:29 am
Your comment is awaiting moderation.

bezuhov1 on October 3, 2021 at 5:48 pm

I have long puzzled over why even intelligent supporters of Brexit almost universally believe that Brexit took place – in the sense of anything more than a piece of meaningless window-dressing to deceive hopelessly gullible Tory party voters.

“Differences of degree not Kind”.

Two dogmas of empiricism.
´´As an empiricist, I continue to think of the conceptual scheme of science as a tool, ultimately, for predicting future experience in the light of past experience. Physical objects are conceptually imported into the situation as convenient intermediaries — not by definition in terms of experience, but simply as irreducible posits18b comparable, epistemologically, to the gods of Homer. Let me interject that for my part I do, qua lay physicist, believe in physical objects and not in Homer’s gods; and I consider it a scientific error to believe otherwise.´´ http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html

Who do you think you are kidding Dr North If you think we’re on the Run. #Technocracy #OligarchicalCollectivism

Who do you think you are kidding Dr North If you think we’re on the Run. #Technocracy #OligarchicalCollectivism

Article 50, Globalisation and the real seat of power. The Top Table and The Trump Card.And the elephant in the room.
roger lewis Uncategorized February 10, 2017, 40 Minutes
The Elephant In the Room.

Article 50, Globalisation and the real seat of power. The Top Table and The Trump Card.And the elephant in the room.

Central Bank Coup Det Tat. The Central Bank Balance Sheet Pandemic. #Covidstroika ITS A DIGITAL BANK PASSPORT NOT A VACCINE PASSPORT #QED. @NAOMIRWOLF @financialeyes @JoeBlob20 @Pathos14658352 @DavidGolemXIV

Central Bank Coup Det Tat. The Central Bank Balance Sheet Pandemic. #Covidstroika ITS A DIGITAL BANK PASSPORT NOT A VACCINE PASSPORT #QED. @NAOMIRWOLF @financialeyes @JoeBlob20 @Pathos14658352 @DavidGolemXIV

@bezuhov1. A political process loosely termed Brexit is merely a narrative providing a commentary to the Rovian Actors in History.

#They The Hierarchy That Enslaves You.

#They The Hierarchy That Enslaves You.

Anti Thesis Speaks in Aphorisms.

As the victor writes history so the powerful pass laws to satisfy their
own ends. Power only represents the powerful.

Ask they who would your bidding do. Listen to your life’s story, History, His
History will not be yours? Be heard.

Do not blanche before appearance of grandeur.
Pompous ceremony seeks to silence chafing curiosity.

The hand that gives also takes away. Often the gift
merely returns that which was stolen from you.

Sophistication often masques ignorance. The humble and rustic often
belies an appreciation of what truly is.

Behind the claimed reality
of how things are lies a deeper truth clothed in the noble lie. He deceived
by the noble lie is excluded as unworthy of an opinion.

Being keen to please and seeking approval from authority feeds ego and
starves the real self.

The devil takes the hindmost. Trampling upon the unfortunate excuses
elitist privilege. There but for the grace of privilege go they!

Discord or overbalancecorrects naturally. In a system where gross
imbalance and discord is evident are we to believe that harmony was ever

Power is an end in itself.
Seeking power to reform injustice is a contradiction in terms. For
harmonious consensus all voices must
strike a chord.

Power relations beget power relations, As the wheel of history turns
repeating mistakes of previous revolutions.

As resolution of discord demands a return to the tonic. The Tonic for our
dissonant condition is a harmonic resolution to the Chord of Nature.

Reality Based Community.

The phrase was attributed by journalist Ron Suskind to an unnamed official in the George W. Bush administration who used it to denigrate a critic of the administration’s policies as someone who based their judgments on facts.[1] In a 2004 article appearing in the New York Times Magazine, Suskind wrote:

The aide said that guys like me were ‘in what we call the reality-based community,’ which he defined as people who ‘believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.’ […] ‘That’s not the way the world really works anymore,’ he continued. ‘We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do’.[2]

´We Pragmatists ´

CHARLES SANDERS PEIRCE: ´´In order toreason well …. it is absolutely necessary to possess … such virtuesas intellectual honesty and sincerity and a real love of truth (2.82). The cause [of the success of scientificinquirers] has been that the motive which has carried them to the laboratory and the field has been a craving toknow how things really were … (1-34).[Genuine inquiry consists I in diligent inquiry into truth for truth’s sake(1.44), … in actually drawing the bow upon truth withintentness in the eye, with energy in the arm (1.235). [When] it is no longer the reasoning which determineswhat the conclusion shall be, but … the conclusion which determines what the reasoning shall be … this is sham reasoning…. The effect of this shamming is that men come to look upon reasoning as mainly decorative…´´. http://web.ncf.ca/ag659/308/Peirce-Rorty-Haack.pdfPierces seminal essay How to make our ideas clear is also a great starting off point for embracing such truth as we might be fortunate enough to encounter in our allotted time on this blue marble suspended in eternity.http://www.peirce.org/writings/p119.html

“Three modes of evolution have thus been brought before us: evolution by fortuitous variation, evolution by mechanical necessity, and evolution by creative love. We may term them tychastic evolution, or tychasm, anancastic evolution, or anancasm, and agapastic evolution, or agapasm. The doctrines which represent these as severally of principal importance we may term tychasticism, anancasticism,and agapasticism. On the other hand the mere propositions that absolute chance, mechanical necessity, and the law of love are severally operative in the cosmos may receive the names of tychism, anancism, and agapism.” — C. S. Peirce, 1893[2]

Why are we here, An essay provoked by Golem XIv´s David Malones latest Documentary Series.

Who Nose?

Ken McMullen Film Director
193 subscribers

Ghost Dance (1983) a film by Ken McMullen- Clip 1- Ghost Dance is a visually impressive and complex examination of ideas about ghosts, memory and the past seen across the adventures of two women(Pascal Ogier and Leonie Mellinger) in Paris and in London.
It draws strongly on influences from Jacques Rivette (Especially Celine and Julie go Boating) and Jean Luc Godard.
The film’s intellectual centre is French theorist Jacques Derrida whose ideas about ghosts being memories of a past never present underline much of what happens on screen.


Author: rogerglewis

https://about.me/rogerlewis Looking for a Job either in Sweden or UK. Freelance, startups, will turń my hand to anything.

Leave a Reply