

"resembles #religion more than a #science"
My favourite 4 slides from the video debunking mainstream #economics @BichlerNitzan (b/c the bad philosophy smell is theređ)
"#Neoclassical Political Economy: Skating on Thin Ice"
VIDEO:âĄď¸ https://t.co/bK8FRkkviR @CasPForum #CasP pic.twitter.com/HhQO5gyY7V
— Agathonia Media (@AgathoniaMedia) November 30, 2021
RANJAN AND ROG DISCUSS CARBON INDULGENCES IN THE CHRUCH OF CLIMATE/COVID CATASTROPHISM
The Economic Superorganism: Review and criticism. Close but no Cigar.

The Economic Superorganism: Review and criticism. Close but no Cigar.
âIt appears that the English word âsabotageâ was at first associated with an emerging working class in the throes of being transformed into docile bodies for capitalists.â
Di Muzio on 'Sabotage' – @blair_fix https://t.co/0QSCg5Io1z
— Phil đđđ§Šđ˛ (@Phil_Free_) December 2, 2021
'capital as power'https://t.co/qBiCeRuFN3 pic.twitter.com/lu7uKuQNAo
— Blair Fix (@blair_fix) December 6, 2021
Two views of inflation:
Left: the standard view â inflation as gauged by a price index. It looks like all prices are headed up
Right: *reality*. Price change varies wildly by commodity.
Inflation is everywhere and always differential.https://t.co/BXddzuK9Se pic.twitter.com/q5B1QgeVaj
— Blair Fix (@blair_fix) December 6, 2021
The richest 10% of Canadians have increased their emissions since 1990 while the bottom 90% have decreased theirs. pic.twitter.com/Tt4wtu09qR
— D. T. Cochrane (@DTCochrane) December 7, 2021





Here are the responses of two editors of heterodox journals to the very same article. Peer review at its subjective best. pic.twitter.com/3Gu1CfTf7E
— Bichler & Nitzan (@BichlerNitzan) December 10, 2021
Also, the most interesting meta level discussion I've encountered about valuation as a practice is on Capital as Power. Highly recommended: https://t.co/URXXlffi6c
— Masto: MattCropp@social.coop đ˛đ˛ (@MattCropp) December 11, 2021

Going Direct , Blacksone the repo spike and #CovidPurpose The Money Pandemic


Virtually all economics since Ricardo been based on equilibrium paradigm.Key corollary: thesis that lower interest rates lead to higher economic growth. 1st empirical test of all classical,neoclassical,Keynesian, post-Keynesian, monetarist,new class econ: https://t.co/7Pej9bVh5g
— Richard Werner (@scientificecon) November 15, 2017
https://www.economics.utoronto.ca/index.php/index/person/person/faculty/50
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piero_Sraffa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sraffa%E2%80%93Hayek_debate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Treatise_on_Money
Dr. Hayek on Money and Capital Piero Sraffa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_value_(economics)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micha%C5%82_Kalecki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joan_Robinson
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Dobb
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Ramsey_(mathematician)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramsey%E2%80%93Lewis_method
Mr Churchills Excercise. British monetary policy, 1924-1931, the Norman conquest of $4.86 #Moggridge
10 thoughts on “nEVER tOUCH THE mONEY sYSTEM, nEO cLASSICAL AND hETRODOX eCONOMICS, tWO cHEEKS OF THE SAME aRSE #gORGEOUS gEORGE”