
The purpose of the 4th Industrial revolution is to stymie the development of energy resources and to control Population and growth and instigate rapid population decline.

Syria and the pipeline wars all point to severe rationing of energy and shortly food to frustrate prosperity. These policies replete with plausible deniability will grow and increasingly eliminate the precariat.

It Don’t mean a thing if it ain’t got that Swing . Tides of the Petrodollar Moon.
The Economic Superorganism: Review and criticism. Close but no Cigar.


All roads lead back to Energy. Energy access and resource distribution are key to “Prosperity” everywhere.

Pelagianism, Free Will Determinism #ActualFantasy #156 #GrubStreetJournal
Unravelling Catastrophe. Seeds of Hope or Seeds of destruction.

James B. Quilligan The Brandt Report, The Brandt Equation, The Financial Commons and Blockchain.
https://sharing.org/information-centre/reports/brandt-report-summary
https://sharing.org/information-centre/reports/brandt-report-summary#Population
https://sharing.org/information-centre/reports/brandt-report-summary#Energy
https://sharing.org/information-centre/reports/brandt-report-summary#Monetary
Guillaume affair
Main article: Guillaume Affair
Around 1973, West German security organizations received information that one of Brandt’s personal assistants, Günter Guillaume, was a spy for the East German intelligence services. Brandt was asked to continue working as usual, and he agreed to do so, even taking a private vacation with Guillaume. Guillaume was arrested on 24 April 1974, and many[who?] blamed Brandt for having a communist spy in his inner circle.[citation needed]
Brandt resigned from his position as chancellor on 6 May 1974, but he remained a member of the Bundestag and chairman of the Social Democrats until 1987. This espionage affair is widely considered to have been just the trigger for Brandt’s resignation, not the fundamental cause. As Brandt himself later said, “I was exhausted, for reasons which had nothing to do with the affair [the Guillaume espionage scandal] going on at the time.”[140] Brandt was dogged by scandals about serial adultery, and reportedly also struggled with alcohol and depression.[141] There was also the economic fallout on West Germany of the 1973 oil crisis, which may seem to have given enough stress to finish off Brandt as the Chancellor.[citation needed]
Guillaume had been an espionage agent for East Germany, who was supervised by Markus Wolf, the head of the Main Directorate for Reconnaissance (Hauptverwaltung Aufklärung or HVA—the foreign intelligence service) of the East German Ministry for State Security. Wolf stated after the reunification that the resignation of Brandt had never been intended, and that the planting and handling of Guillaume had been one of the biggest mistakes of the East German secret services.
Brandt was succeeded as the Chancellor of the Bundesrepublik by his fellow Social Democrat, Helmut Schmidt. For the rest of his life, Brandt remained suspicious that his fellow Social Democrat (and longtime rival) Herbert Wehner had been scheming for Brandt’s downfall.[citation needed] However, there is scant evidence to corroborate this suspicion.

Globalism/ Internationalism / Imperialism.


The Dirt Book: How the sexual abuse of children is used for political gain

Insight into the Johnson mindset and handling of Covid. British media’s favourite daddy Stanley explains his population control theory to reduce UK inhabitants to ‘10 or 15 million’. You can bet that includes every one of the Johnsons. pic.twitter.com/jNBOEYrzHZ
— Phantom Power (@PhantomPower14) January 23, 2021
#CONQUESTOFDOUGH MULTI MEDIA NOVEL CHAPTER 5 READING The Sky is falling in.
Wall Street Owns The CountryA Speech by Mary Elizabeth Lease (circa 1890)
This is a nation of inconsistencies. The Puritans fleeing from oppression became oppressors. We fought England for our liberty and put chains on four million of blacks. We wiped out slavery and our tariff laws and national banks began a system of white wage slavery worse than the first. Wall Street owns the country. It is no longer a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, but a government of Wall Street, by Wall Street, and for Wall Street. The great common people of this country are slaves, and monopoly is the master. The West and South are bound and prostrate before the manufacturing East. Money rules, and our Vice-President is a London banker. Our laws are the output of a system which clothes rascals in robes and honesty in rags. The [political] parties lie to us and the political speakers mislead us. We were told two years ago to go to work and raise a big crop, that was all we needed. We went to work and plowed and planted; the rains fell, the sun shone, nature smiled, and we raised the big crop that they told us to; and what came of it? Eight-cent corn, ten-cent oats, two-cent beef and no price at all for butter and eggs-that’s what came of it. The politicians said we suffered from overproduction. Overproduction, when 10,000 little children, so statistics tell us, starve to death every year in the United States, and over 100,000 shopgirls in New York are forced to sell their virtue for the bread their niggardly wages deny them… We want money, land and transportation. We want the abolition of the National Banks, and we want the power to make loans direct from the government. We want the foreclosure system wiped out… We will stand by our homes and stay by our fireside by force if necessary, and we will not pay our debts to the loan-shark companies until the government pays its debts to us. The people are at bay; let the bloodhounds of money who dogged us thus far beware.
Globalisation Un-Entangled. (A FOUND POEM, CIPHER OF GLOBALISM )
The value of a colony to the mother country, according to the
common mode of computation, is equal to the sum total of imports
from that colony and exports to it put together.
From this statement, if the foregoing observation be just,
the following deductions will come to be made.
1. The whole value of the exports to the colony.
2. So much of the imports as is balanced by the exports.
3. Such a portion of the above remainder as answers to so
much of the trade as would be equally carried on, were the colony
independent.
4. So much of that reduced profit as would be made, were the
same capital employed in any other trade or branch of industry
lost by the independence of the colony.
5. But the same capital, if employed in agriculture. would
have produced a rent over and above the ordinary profits of
capital: which rent, according to a general and undisputed
computation, may be stated at a sum equal to the amount of those
profits. Thence arises a further deduction, viz. the loss to the
nation caused by employing the capital in the trade to the
colony, in preference to the improvement of land, and thence upon
the supposition that the continuance of the trade depended upon
the keeping the colony in subjection.
The other mischiefs resulting from the keeping of a colony in
subjection, are:
1. The expence of its establishment, civil and military.
2. The contingent expence of wars and other coercive measures
for keeping it in subjection.
3. The contingent expence of wars for the defence of it
against foreign powers.
4. The force, military and naval, constantly kept on foot
under the apprehension of such wars.
5. The occasional danger to political liberty from the force
thus kept up.
6. The contingent expence of wars produced by alliances
contracted for the purpose of supporting wars that may be brought
on by the defence of it.
7. The corruptive effects of the influence resulting from the
patronage of the establishment, civil and military.
8. The damage that must be done to the national stock of
intelligence by the false views of the national interest, which
must be kept up in order to prevent the nation from opening their
eyes and insisting upon the enfranchisement of the colony.
9. The sacrifice that must be made of the real interest of
the colony to this imaginary interest of the mother-country. It
is for the purpose of governing it badly, and for no other, that
you wish to get or keep a colony. Govern it well, it is of no use
to you.
To govern its inhabitants as well as they would govern
themselves, you must choose to govern them those only whom they
would themselves choose, you must sacrifice none of their
interests to your own, you must bestow as much time and attention
to their interests as they would themselves, in a word, you must
take those very measures and no others, which they themselves
would take. But would this be governing? And what would it be
worth to you, if it were?
After all, it would be impossible for you to govern them so
well as they would themselves, on account of the distance.
10. The bad government resulting to the mother-country from
the complication, the indistinct views of things, and the
consumption of time occasioned by this load of distant
dependencies.
Globalisation Un-Entangled. (A FOUND POEM, CIPHER OF GLOBALISM )
Manchester Terror Attack , A Reichstag Fire Moment for Mrs May?
Sarpi believed that government institutions should rescind their censorship of the Avvisi—the newsletters that started to be common in his time—and instead of censorship, publish their own versions of the news to counter enemy publications. In that spirit, Sarpi himself published several pamphlets in defense of Venice’s rights over the Adriatic. As such, Sarpi could be considered as an early advocate of the freedom of the press, though the concept did not yet exist in his lifetime.
Cory Morningstar
1.26K subscribers
From the Non-Profit Industrial Complex with Love | The Art of Annihilation
“… and I will say this to our colleagues from Western civil society – you have definitely sided with a small group of industrialists and their representatives and your representative branches. Nothing more than that. You have become an instrument of your governments.” – Lumumba Di-Aping
Where is the line that distinguishes the bystander from the perpetrator when atrocity becomes both systemic and political?
In December 2009, the Morales government proved the most progressive of all states (in alliance with ALBA, the AOSIS and the G77 nations) at the COP15 climate meeting in Copenhagen. This union, led by Bolivia, aggressively pursued the scientific targets necessary in order for the world to avoid complete ecological collapse and a global genocide of unparalleled proportions. Ironically (and most revealing), these progressive states led leaps and bounds ahead of the environmental movement itself.
The institutionalized environmental “movement” was united under an umbrella organization/campaign titled TckTckTck, a social media giant, contrived by some of the world’s most powerful corporations and marketing executives. [1] One such TckTckTck partner (there are 280 partners made public) was the Corporate Leaders Group on Climate Change consisting of corporations such as Shell, RBF and Coca-Cola. (When this information was uncovered and made public, TckTckTck removed them from their website and scrambled to recover from the PR nightmare.) The Bolivian government’s leadership was so incredibly dignified and courageous that it even put the more legitimate Climate Justice movement to shame.
“In an open struggle between truth and falsehood, truth has nothing to fear. ´´ Frank Harris….

https://notthegrubstreetjournal.com/2021/04/05/experimenting-with-issuu-embeds-logos-etc-tonefreqhz/
An idiots guide to arguing with bankers well worth a recap from 2011
Covidstroika, Corked Wine in New bottles the Great Reset #WrongKindofGreen
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QAYD4xvYI66fCkINtpBvrUFeXiJYyinR/view?usp=sharing
The RBS scandal and why it really matters…
3 thoughts on “Globalism/ Internationalism / Imperialism. The Scramble for everything and everybody. #4IR #GreatReset #BuildBackBetter”