It looks increasingly like the Theories from the ’70s and ’80s from the likes of Anthony Sutton and Douglas Reed are increasingly being vindicated. One of the last gateways with centuries(sic) on both sides seems to me to be the oldest of modern political economy canards that of the court Jew. Zionism and Judaism are distinct and quite different things. Zionism is Imperialism’s answer to Arab Nationalism. Israeli Nationalism is not necessarily Zionism and what perhaps is a fruitful demarcation to pursue would be as between, Leninism, Trotskyism, and Stalinism not as Communist or Marxist theorists but as theories of Real Politik. Another interesting factional study would be The Spanish Civil War and also the French and American revolutions. Another big year for such studies would be 1848 when there are too many revolutions to list.
Amongst the banking factions? are there any longer any factions. Larry Fink Black rock is performing the same role as Armand Hammer? who is the new Hammer. Who pulls Kissinger’s strings, used to be David Rockerfeller , who is the new Rockerfeller, surely not Klaus Schwab.?
behind trumps right shoulder to the left as you view.
Both the Dollar and the Euro are arguably in the way of a one-world international trading currency?
Dag Anthony & de rest ; ik wilde even een SUPER-pdfje met jullie delen, al zal, nee, al IS de inhoud je al lang bekend :
PDF The Jew World Order :
Click to access
Virulent anti semites are it seems incapable of seeing the cleevage of Zionism to Imperialism, which then begs the chicken and egg question.
The Talmud was compiled under Roman protection ( At least at first ). Josephus is the source of much of what is known of Jesus’s Life The root of the Abrahamic faiths is more complicated than simple Judaism, the factional basis of religious differences for me point to the political basis of Established faith narratives rather than the divine basis. In terms of layers of gatekeeping Imperialism always trumps religion in the hierarchy the ultimate religion is pure power and the divine right of kings and rulers.
For Orthodox Jews, the obligations recorded in the Oral Law are as binding as those recorded in the Written Torah. In this view, the laws articulated by the rabbis of the Talmud — and those who later codified them systematically in works like the Mishneh Torah and the Shulchan Aruch — were not merely legislating, but deducing law that had always been practiced going back to Sinai. The rabbis of the Gemara were scrupulous about rooting the sources for their teachings in scriptural verses and/or received traditions so as to buttress their legitimacy. As such, the Oral Law has the status of a direct divine command among Orthodox Jews. Liberal Jews take a somewhat different approach. As a general rule, Reform Judaism does not accept the binding nature of Jewish law, or halacha, seeing the Oral Law as the product of human beings operating within the assumptions and beliefs of a specific historical moment rather than an extension of divine revelation. Conservative Judaism officially accepts the binding nature of the oral tradition but finds much more flexibility within its strictures than Orthodox Jews and claims for modern rabbis greater authority to depart from rabbinic rulings made centuries ago.
Islam and Christianity have a similar tradition around the divine basis and then interpretation and authority of interpretation. before Abraham is, of course, another story my own view is that starting after the second temple period suffices to explain the current period of history faith systems are inherently syncretic as is successful imperialism. Rigid dogma is a useful device for provoking civil wars and wars between cultural and religious groupings.
Momus BY CARL SANDBURG
Momus is the name men give your face,
The brag of its tone, like a long low steamboat whistle
Finding a way mid mist on a shoreland,
Where gray rocks let the salt water shatter spray Against horizons purple, silent.
Men have flung your face in bronze
To gaze in gargoyle downward on a street-whirl of folk.
They were artists did this, shaped your sad mouth,
Gave you a tall forehead slanted with calm, broad wisdom;
All your lips to the corners and your cheeks to the high bones
Thrown over and through with a smile that forever wishes and wishes, purple, silent, fled from all the iron things of life, evaded like a sought bandit, gone into dreams, by God.
I wonder, Momus,
Whether shadows of the dead sit somewhere and look with deep laughter
On men who play in terrible earnest the old, known, solemn repetitions of history.
A droning monotone soft as sea laughter hovers from your kindliness of bronze,
You give me the human ease of a mountain peak, purple, silent;
Granite shoulders heaving above the earth curves,
Careless eye-witness of the spawning tides of men and women
Swarming always in a drift of millions to the dust of toil, the salt of tears,
And blood drops of undiminishing war.
#TheDunciad spitting image is the modern #Dunciad the House of Commons is the Parliament of Fools, the MSM a Hoard of Scriblerus’ sycophants.The Dunciad,(More Pope, Less Vatican venality) Madness of Crowds #CovidPurpose #Plandemic Of dull and venal a new world to mould, And bring Saturnian days of lead and gold. “Monks ´´sans humilite´´ fane ease Like Pope we find our actors ´´All, all alike, find reason on their side´´ @CATHERINEBADIN @FINANCIALEYES @JOEBLOB20 #COVIDPURPOSE @CLARKEMICAH #CONQUESTOFDOUGH @WIKI_BALLOT @LUKEWRIGHTPOET
Let power or knowledge, gold or glory, please,
Or (oft more strong than all) the love of ease;
Through life ’tis followed, even at life’s expense;
The merchant’s toil, the sage’s indolence,
The monk’s humility, the hero’s pride,
All, all alike, find reason on their side.
Essay on Man , Epistle 2 Alexander Pope.
”We lived in venice when Marco Polo returnedHe told of Kubla khans riches.Khans riches flowed from a strange Alchemy,Money from Trees, Bark from Mulberry´s.Denominated and sizes, under seal of the Khan.Fein deafness to the khans bark on pain of death!They serve as good as gold, a fraction of the weight.All foreign merchants sell to khans monopoly,the merchants trade with paper in the kingdom”Such power as this with a twist of usury,we innovate Marco Polos discovery.Creating the money but not the means to meet the usuryall wealth guaranteed to flow back to the issuer.Money newly grown on trees, with usury sportingly absent.Surely a creature who´s Bark is not worse than its bite?kings now borrowed for rivals to smite.Bankers became emperors. Usury were the real fangs.´´
Ted Nelsons Hypertext portends and is prescient on the HTTP/URL world of the Internet and interweb. Ted distinguishes the two, The Internet is an ocean and The Web, bound and limited to flaky old URLs Is a Boat whose bilge pumps, eject out mere electronic media making its imitation of print on paper.
With Xanudocs and Transclusion, the provenance of Ideas in electronic documents provide the Timelines with both, forward; from the present date of any extant document, and also backwards into the mists of provenance. There are a plethora of terminology in the Xanadu world which Douglas Adams called hyper land in his excellent documentary of the same name Hyperland, Sideways and all manner of other exotic dimensions previously unimagined are catered for.
David Bowie in an interview with Jeremy Paxman back in 1999 described the Internet Audience, Reader, Listener and watcher as a participant in the flow of ideas a meeting of the Regarding mind with the grey space of the internet emittances completing the picture Regardeur de Tableaux,
And here we meet This Blog and its look at meaning and context and the motivation behind the Intended meaning of Historians.
Of Course, Kubla khan decreed his pleasure dome and Coleridge offered it up as a Fragment.
Or, a vision in a dream. A Fragment.
In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
A stately pleasure-dome decree:
Where Alph, the sacred river, ran
Through caverns measureless to man
Philip Dru: AdministratorChapter IGraduation Day
In the year 1920, the student and the statesman saw many indications that the social, financial and industrial troubles that had vexed the United States of America for so long a time were about to culminate in civil war.
Wealth had grown so strong, that the few were about to strangle the many, and among the great masses of the people, there was sullen and rebellious discontent.
The laborer in the cities, the producer on the farm, the merchant, the professional man and all save organized capital and its satellites, saw a gloomy and hopeless future.
With these conditions prevailing, the graduation exercises of the class of 1920 of the National Military Academy at West Point, held for many a foreboding promise of momentous changes, but the 12th of June found the usual gay scene at the great institution overlooking the Hudson. The President of the Republic, his Secretary of War and many other distinguished guests were there to do honor to the occasion, together with friends, relatives and admirers of the young men who were being sent out to the ultimate leadership of the Nation’s Army. The scene had all the usual charm of West Point graduations, and the usual intoxicating atmosphere of military display.