What have the Romans ever done for us?
Famously this was the question posed in the Life of Brian, John Cleese, Michael Paling and eric Idol.
Having decided that the Romans on balance were not all they might be the question then becomes how best to achieve the objective of “Romani ite domum”
Judea people’s front or People’s front of judea?
“We shall fight the oppressors for your right to have babies Bruvver”
One wonders if there is a remake of the life of Brian in the works with Zalensky slated for the Role of Otto The Zionist Nazi, which scenes ended up on the cutting room floor in the original release.
OTTO THE ZIONIST NAZI ( MONTY PYTHON)
So who is claiming the laurels who is offering the solutions and claiming based upon their track record to be the holder of the solutions the keeper of the panacea? Is it Klaus Schwab, What have the WEF ever done for us? Is it Bill Gates, What has the Bill and Mellinda Gates foundation ever done for us? Is it the the European Union or NATO?
Kennedy (JFK) famously said, ” Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country” All well and good but to what end? What is the point? What are the objectives? what are the problems we are able to tackle and which problems should be prioritised.
Untangling Cognitive Dissonance. Pt 1 Notestonefreqhz (34)in #cognitivedissonance • 3 years ago
I wrote or compiled this on Brexit over 3 years ago, the longer a period of time one keeps a diary or a blog and hence have a record to consult on past events and ones reaction at the time the more the Song remains the same the French have a pithy little phrase for it ,
plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose
Essentially the Song remains the same, particularly when it comes to protest songs.
41:10 Who’s Responsible?
43:26 The Song Remains The Same
I had a dream
Oh, yeah
Crazy dream, uh-huh
Anything I wanted to know
Any place I needed to go
Hear my song
Yeah, people do not you listen now?
Sing along
Bourgeois resolution. A poem in Three Voices for added 4th part Harmony.
https://fandalism.com/rogerg/d8yJ
Yesterday I did a live reaction in the Going Direct Paradigm mindmap to a reading of George Orwell’s Chapters The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism in the novel 1984.
The Live chat replay has links to the pages in the mind map and from there to different links from the mind map nodes which prompted associations as I listened to the Fictional Words of Emanuel Goldstein recounted by Orwell ( Eric Blair) In 1984.
Walden Two is a utopian novel written by behavioral psychologist B. F. Skinner, first published in 1948. In its time, it could have been considered science fiction, since science-based methods for altering people’s behavior did not yet exist.[1][2] Such methods are now known as applied behavior analysis.
Walden Two is controversial because its characters speak of a rejection of free will,[3] including a rejection of the proposition that human behavior is controlled by a non-corporeal entity, such as a spirit or a soul.[4] Walden Two embraces the proposition that the behavior of organisms, including humans, is determined by environmental variables,[5] and that systematically altering environmental variables can generate a sociocultural system that very closely approximates utopia.[6]
Brexit, Oceania or Eurasia the true choice all along. Ukraine, Oceania or Eurasia is the true choice, both are mutually inclusive substitutable propositions from Orwells 1949 Novel, and into the geopolitical analysis of Brexit,or The Ukraine “Special Operation”
At this point, I do not see the point of expounding further
THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF OLIGARCHICAL COLLECTIVISM by Emmanuel Goldstein
THE SUNDAY ESSAY: A history and future of dystopia
