Is very instructive as it gives a context from 2011 and now. The Texit v Brexit comparison is interesting, I offer my Poem on Brexit and democratic mandates
for some context, The Referendum on Brexit in 2016 was the result of a general election promise whilst David Camerons Coalition with Tim Clegg ( Now at Facebook)
the referendum on EU membership was also offered in the 2015 Election by Farages UKIP and Caroline Lucas’s Greens. A #TEXIT referendum would no doubt have some of the key players thought to have been interested in the
outcome of the Brexit referendum, namely the Mercers, and Brexit and Farage and Donald Trump are all intertwined with that story. Of Course, President Obama threatened the UK with the back of the queue if it voted for Brexit with respect to Trade deals namely, TTP and TTIP, and CETA
so Texit and Brexit have some interesting parallels but the Scottish independence referendum probably has greater parallels and the EU’s attitude to Scottish independence could be broadly considered in line with the Federal Governments view on a Texas Cessation.
Scotland also has North Sea oil, interestingly Norway is not in the EU and maintains its own currency, the much-vaunted Norway option for the UK might be of interest to Texans looking at the US Dollar, of course, they should also look at the work of Ellen Brown on the Bank of North Dakota.
What is the direction of travel and main narrative embedded in the Narrative of the past 40 years? The Rules Based International Order or ( New World Order ) Narratives.
The driving motivation behind the accelerated rush to Techno Fascist Feudalism has been occupying my mind for the years leading up to the Repo Spike in New York in September 2019.
In the Financialised economy and with the CBDC push tied to Digital IDs, we see a symptom of the appearance of what the system is trying to preserve, namely itself and its Monopoly ingroup. The real economy is put in the position of trying to make bricks without straw, a misallocation of resources, and the Credit tokens to acquire those resources.
The Dominant Resource tieing the Financial system’s real potential’s in the real economy is the Flow of Energy Resources and Primary resources through the economy. It would seem that a Hard limit on available energy to sustain the present industrial output of the global economy has been hit, what seems inexplicable is the Priorities touted in narratives regarding Why our largest Energy Sources the Hydro Carbons, Gas, Oil, and Coal, and the largest potential replacement for them Nuclear are being demonised? It is more properly described as being stood down, why? Climate Change, The Climate Crisis, The Plague of Humans. (1)
“The purpose of the 4th Industrial revolution is to stymie the development of energy resources and to control Population and growth and instigate rapid population decline”.
The cakes currently burning King Alfred style were placed in the Oven in the pivotal period.
2015 Election, Feb 2016 oil price low, 2016 Brexit/trump, 2017 Election, September 2018 Repo Spike 2019 Election, Covid 19.
Covid 19 is a distraction the main currents date back to policy following the break up of the Soviet Union, 1990, 2000 Dot Com Bubble, 9/11, 7/7, 2008 GFC 2010 Coalition and
Build Back Better Going Direct and 4IR are all Political Slogans for the Trilateral World Government party, which represents only the hybridized Elite Billionaire class and their lackeys. Differential accumulation is their only concern and also of course population control.
Mackintoshes book shares the following “Quality” with Carey, it is an apologetic, a Polemic, and A Narrative. Careys is better disguised Though. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/5…
“In Short, the book is an exercise in knocking down mutually opposed straw men arguments, much of the argumentation I take no issue with whatsoever but the Ultimate apologetics for the discredited Climate Scientism and advocacy for Carbon indulgences ( SPASH #WrongKindofGreen Brave New World of Carbon Trading ) coupled with a failure to consider International Finance and PetroDollar hegemony which is an effect that the Authors own “Swing producer” price stability arguments for Texas in 1935, and in which we find ourselves living again in a deflationary age of a Quasi Petro/Carbon Gold Standard.”
QED.
The Going Direct Paradigm
The driving motivation behind the accelerated rush to Techno Fascist Feudalism has been occupying my mind for the years leading up to the Repo Spike in New York in September 2019.
In the Financialised economy and with the CBDC push tied to DIgital Id’s, we see a symptom of the appearance of what the system is trying to preserve, namely itself and its Monopoly ingroup. The real economy is put in the position of trying to make bricks without straw, a misallocation of resources, and the Credit tokens to acquire those resources.
The Dominant Resource tieing the Financial system’s real potential to the potential of the real economy is the Flow of Energy Resources and Primary resources through the economy. It would seem that a Hard limit on available energy to sustain the present industrial output of the global economy has been hit, what seems inexplicable is the Priorities touted in narratives regarding Why our largest Energy Sources the Hydro Carbons, Gas, Oil, and Coal, and the largest potential replacement for them Nuclear are being demonised? It is more properly described as being stood down, why? “Climate Change”, “The Climate Crisis”, “The Plague of Humans”
Continuing on with initial thoughts consider NAFTA and other giant sucking sounds, all relevant to the current theme that The Dork from Cork has been highlighting on Twitter that of entrepot hinterlands.
Just a guess but White Russian Heavy oil trains coming through to feed Combined Heat power plants in Vilnius . Much surplus capacity because economy crashed . Surplus exported to rest of Europe… Anybody with local knowledge ?
Since money is not wealth, but a means of exchange, it is absurd to say that a shortage of it makes us poor when we have abundance of real wealth in the shape of commodities.https://t.co/BfU4XbhfKApic.twitter.com/zk3BbS1lHZ
— Real-Estate Land Development Limited (@RealEstateLand3) March 6, 2023
Before looking at the size of the Texas economy in its full “Who Shot JR” Glory, Big oil and ten-gallon hats bely some of the other famous and not-so-famous sons of the bridesmaid City Austin, over Houston or Dallas, Based in Austin is of course info wars but also Stratfor.
Walter Burien should be brought to mind here and the Gold Bug Hard money tendency, which allegedly Ron Paul, Alex Jones, etc all tend toward. ” Keynes called it “” A monstrous Anachronism” This is not an attempt to poison the well a Texas Cessation is an interesting question as of course Was/Is Brexit.
Alex Jones and Ron Paul know a lot about the New World Order and are right about a lot of things. However, they are also working on the New World Order’s biggest endgame, a new economic order, a new economic Pearl Harbor, which will enslave the productive serfs to the idle aristocrats and international bankers. They want total economic enslavement through monetary usury. They want the serfs to love their enslavement and call it freedom. They want the serfs to make tribute payments to the non-productive aristocrats on increasing national debt in the increasing value of gold made legal tender by the New World Order. Alex Jones and Ron Paul promote the communism for the rich known as feudalism.
Alex Jones revealed “The New Pearl Harbor” document from the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) called “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” as part of the New World Order’s agenda. Alex Jones fails to mention another document, written by PNAC board member Lewis Lehrman, called “Money and the Coming World Order: The Creation of International Monetary Order“. The document is hosted on web site called, “Gold Standard Now,” which is a project for the Lehrman Institute. The title is quite revealing that PNAC’s Lewis Lehrman wants a New World Order based on the gold standard. According to Lewis Lehrman, we’ll be on the New World Order’s gold standard in five years.
Lewis Lehrman also partnered with Ron Paul to write The Case for Gold. Alex Jones is a dedicated promoter of Ron Paul and a return to the gold standard. Alex Jones and Ron Paul also both have significant investments in gold, with the producer of the Alex Jones show being a gold trader. It seems that Alex Jones knows a lot about the endgame of the New World Order and the blueprint for global enslavement. What Alex Jones does not tell you is that the gold standard is part of the endgame and blueprint for global enslavement, and that Ron Paul and Alex Jones are heavily invested into it. Since they actively promote a gold standard, they are not merely invested in gold just because they fear a new world gold standard. They are complicit in that agenda.
Ron Paul also gave public support for globalization and a one world currency, gold, in the public record.
“There’s nothing to fear from globalism, free trade and a single worldwide currency…. The effort in recent decades to unify government surveillance over all world trade and international financial transactions through the UN, IMF, World Bank, WTO, ICC, the OECD, and the Bank of International Settlements can never substitute for a peaceful world based on true free trade, freedom of movement, a single but sound market currency, and voluntary contracts with private property rights…. The ultimate solution will only come with the rejection of fiat money worldwide, and a restoration of commodity money. Commodity money if voluntarily and universally accepted could give us a single world currency requiring no money managers, no manipulators orchestrating a man-made business cycle with rampant price inflation.” — Ron Paul, Congressional Record, March 13, 2001
Ludwig von Mises and the Austrian School of Economics was also funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, the same people who created the United Nations, World Bank, and IMF, and the same people behind Standard Oil, Exxon-Mobile, the Federal Reserve, and Chase Bank, and the same people behind the eugenics program in America.
“Many readers may be surprised to learn the extent to which the Graduate Institute and then Mises himself in the years immediately after he came to United States were kept afloat financially through generous grants from the Rockefeller Foundation. In fact, for the first years of Mises’s life in the United States, before his appointment as a visiting professor in the Graduate School of Business Administration at New York University (NYU) in 1945, he was almost totally dependent on annual research grants from the Rockefeller Foundation.” – Richard M. Ebeling, The Life and Works of Ludwig von Mises
Military Unification has been on the European Union’s policy agenda for decades. In the past twelve months, the pressure to complete the task has accelerated the process, particularly since the Bratislava Summit of September 2016.
There, the 27 leaders of the EU decided to “give a new impetus” to European external security and defense.
They set as a target the December 2016 European Council to formalise an implementation plan.
To quote one commentator, “European Union Defence plans are associated with the eventual formation of a European Federal State. Under the current system of unaccountable governance, this means they will be run by an unelected oligarchy. A nation-state that contracts out its defence has ceased to be.”
Since money is not wealth, but a means of exchange, it is absurd to say that a shortage of it makes us poor when we have abundance of real wealth in the shape of commodities.https://t.co/BfU4XbhfKApic.twitter.com/zk3BbS1lHZ
— Real-Estate Land Development Limited (@RealEstateLand3) March 6, 2023
— Franklin D. Roosevelt, “Message from the President of the United States Transmitting Recommendations Relative to the Strengthening and Enforcement of anti-trust Laws”[9][10]
What is the direction of travel and main narrative embedded in the Narrative of the past 40 years? The Rules Based International Order or ( New World Order ) Narratives.
Globalisation and Urbbanisation.
2.Petro Dollar Hegenomy . Addiction to Oil.
Man Made Global Warming
Overshoot Overpopulation
Elitism, Starfucking worship of ”The Elites**
Tragedy and Hope.
Chapter 3—Europe’s Shift to the Twentieth Century.
While Europe’s traits were diffusing outward to the non-European world, Europe was
also undergoing profound changes and facing difficult choices at home. These choices
were associated with drastic changes, in some cases we might say reversals, of Europe’s
point of view. These changes may be examined under eight headings. The nineteenth
century was marked by
(1) belief in the innate goodness of man;
(2) secularism;
(3) belief in progress;
(4) liberalism;
(5) capitalism;
(6) faith in science;
(7) democracy;
(8) nationalism. In general, these eight factors went along together in the nineteenth century.
They were generally regarded as being compatible with one another; the friends of one
were generally the friends of the others; the enemies of one were generally the
enemies of the rest.
Metternich and De Maistre were generally opposed to all eight;
Thomas Jefferson and John Stuart Mill were generally in favor of all eight..
I have been getting my head further around The Energy Market and how it affects the money supply
I think the priority variables are
1. Electricity Base Load production, Coal and Natural Gas, and LPG products?
2. Crude Oil Production and Refinery capacities, Volumes of production are more important than the price per barrel 3. Swing Production from Shale or Capped and ready to go existing discoveries, Very important to who has upper hand on Marginal pricing on swing production, Texas Rail Road, OPEC, US Shale production?
4. Gas Production and Coal production are probably equal with 3 or interchangeable with 3.
5. Venezuelan and Iranian supply disruption through Sanctions is a political bottleneck to an otherwise trivial supply problem
in the Oil Market.
6. Geo-Political and Green New Deal political economy choices vis Gas Pipe Lines are again self inflicted pwn goals?
Why?
7. Money Velocity and Money Supply related to energy use growth are being severely impacted by levels of COnsumer, Corporate and Sovereign debt.
JA
I am not sure about the impact on China. It is still a political society, so the impact could be very great. I mean I often say that censorship is always cause for celebration. It is always an opportunity, because it reveals fear of reform. It means that the power position is so weak that you have got to care about what people think. Julian Assange.
JC
Right. It’s like you find the sensitive documents by watching them hunt.
JA
Exactly.
ES
This is a very interesting argument.
JC
Sorry, I didn’t mean to interrupt.
JA
So when the Chinese express all this energy on censoring in all these novel ways, do we say that it is a complete waste of time and energy, or do they have a whole bunch of experience managing the country and understand that it matters what people think? I say it is much more reasonable to interpret it as the different groups different actors within China who are able to control that censorship system understand correctly that their power position is weak and they need to be careful what people think. So they have to censor.
Video at Taceo
Today, chess programs have become so good that even grandmasters sometimes struggle to understand the logic behind some of their moves.
Kenneth Rogoff
karelvan wolferen says
´´But it still leaves us with the puzzle of why Asians as well as Europeans, whose EU trade commissioners have been mouthing the same job creating nonsense around the TPIP that has come with the TPP, appear unable to tackle intellectually the dominant power aspects of these treaties. Perhaps because they exist in a world of their own that is politically sterilized by current economic suppositions. More generally, the concept of power (not influence with which it is often confused) receives a stepmotherly treatment in popular as well as serious writing, and the social science denizens of academia are entirely at sea with it. Mainstream economics is ahistorcal on purpose and hence has no room for power, which has helped continue the fateful division of political and economic affairs into separate realms for discussion that has long served the interests of power elites´´ http://www.karelvanwolferen.com/49-the-predators-behind-the-tpp-14-oct-2015/
Wolferen has more to say , this for instance.
´´Since the political dimension to economic arrangements in the United States remains hidden in most discourse because political and economic reality are routinely treated as separate realms of life, few notice that what is justified in the United States by casting it in terms of the market at work, is frequently the result of heavy political involvement and interference. Politically well-connected American corporations, paying for the election expenses of Congress members who determine their fate, need not fear ‘market forces’. If the banks responsible for the credit crisis of 2008 and the subsequent world-recession that is still with us, had not been lifted out of ‘the market’ by the state, they would no longer exist. Powerful corporations have been allowed to swallow the state; they have as the power sensitive economist James Galbraith calls it, created a ‘predator state’, which they of course exploit for their own expansion. There is no frame of reference with which we can more convincingly define the TPP.´´
Some before and after Discourse on Brexit. Pillow Talk Tett and Lord King.
Gillian Tett and Lord King.Tett after New your law school
The President of the Union since 2004 is Alain Terrenoire, former Member of Parliament in France and MEP and Director of the French Paneuropa-Union. Otto Habsburg became the International Honorary President of the International Paneuropean Union in 2004. Its Vice President is Walburga Habsburg Douglas, a member of the Swedish Parliament.
Benedict Arnold.
The Scandic Model, Carl Bilt and the assassinations of Olof Palme and Jo Cox, amongst others? Sweden is being herded into the US Exceptionalism/NWO camp, Palme was in the Trotskyist Camp?
Laizez Faire American Exceptionalism, Nixon, Trump, JFK?
US Exceptionalism, Imperialist NWO BUSH/Cheney EUFederalist and (NATO?) Axis
UN NWO ELite Exceptionalism, Stalinist Serfdom Clinton/Obama
UN Globalist Trotskyism, Corbyn, Sanders
Netanyahu/ Wihabbi/ Moslem Brotherhood Faction aligned to US Exceptionalist Zionist Imperialism.
The Queen,
The Common Wealth
Trump/Benedict Arnold ( Marrying the wrong Woman)
Jackson
Prince Andrew, Prince Harry, Prince William and Prince Charles
Edward and Mrs Simpson
The 3rd Reich, The Abdication and Plans for the Occupation of the United Kingdom
Irish Neutrality?
Deutsche bank.
Benedict Arnold
Plotting to change sides
Historians have identified many possible factors contributing to Arnold’s treason, while some debate their relative importance. According to W. D. Wetherell, he was:
among the hardest human beings to understand in American history. Did he become a traitor because of all the injustice he suffered, real and imagined, at the hands of the Continental Congress and his jealous fellow generals? Because of the constant agony of two battlefield wounds in an already gout-ridden leg? From psychological wounds received in his Connecticut childhood when his alcoholic father squandered the family’s fortunes? Or was it a kind of extreme midlife crisis, swerving from radical political beliefs to reactionary ones, a change accelerated by his marriage to the very young, very pretty, very Tory Peggy Shippen?[61]
Wetherell says that the shortest explanation for his treason is that he
Charles A. S. Hall’s Cover blurb for the Carey w King Tomb is I think a fair reaction to what is a long and complex book. The author himself says that the lengthy quotes ( for context) and juxtaposition of opposing narratives are overly long
As a choice for the material, I question the wisdom of the choice but congratulate the effort, the net result if one is being generous, works and is fittingly described in the blurb by a giant in the field of Energy-Based economics( Political Economy)Prof. Charles Hall.
Marx via Schumpeter makes an appearance late in the book, which saves some face on the shortcomings in monetary theory, and the influence on the Author’s thinking of Prof Steve Keen’s own flavour of heterodox Economics shows, also in reflecting Keen’s own limitations. The Authors dislike of Matt Riddley shines through and gives a tell to the Authors own inclinations, an admitted likely failing in his own introduction (“I discuss many matters as objectively as I can, but I don’t claim that either, or anyone can be perfectly objective. “) Well said.
The Chapters on Debt and Finance are fine as far as they go and the Schumpeter quotes save the whole piece to my own tastes for a better grasp of Shumpeters insights into the money as credit context see Werner, much of the polemic even allowing for putting both sides is hackneyed retreaded phony “enfant terriblism” of the Leather jacket like Yannis’ variety.
Getting the niceties out of the way the Lacunae is the old apples and Oranges problem encountered at the SEEDS Surplus Energy Blog of Dr. Tim Morgan, Dangerous Exponentials, and The Perfect Storm.
In Short, the book is an exercise in knocking down mutually opposed straw men arguments, much of the argumentation I take no issue with whatsoever but the Ultimate apologetics for the discredited Climate Scientism and advocacy for Carbon indulgences ( SPASH #WrongKindofGreen Brave New World of Carbon Trading ) coupled with a failure to consider International Finance and PetroDollar hegemony which is an effect that the Authors own “Swing producer” price stability arguments for Texas in 1935, and in which we find ourselves living again in a deflationary age of a Quasi Petro/Carbon Gold Standard.
QED.
Abstract
In this letter I compare two measures of energy quality, energy return on energy invested
(EROI) and energy intensity ratio (EIR) for the fossil fuel consumption and production of the
United States. All other characteristics being equal, a fuel or energy system with a higher EROI
or EIR is of better quality because more energy is provided to society. I define and calculate the
EIR for oil, natural gas, coal, and electricity as measures of the energy intensity (units of energy
divided by money) of the energy resource relative to the energy intensity of the overall
economy. EIR measures based upon various unit prices for energy (e.g. $/Btu of a barrel of oil)
as well as total expenditures on energy supplies (e.g. total dollars spent on petroleum) indicate
net energy at different points in the supply chain of the overall energy system. The results
indicate that EIR is an easily calculated and effective proxy for EROI for US oil, gas, coal, and
electricity. The EIR correlates well with previous EROI calculations, but adds additional
information on energy resource quality within the supply chain. Furthermore, the EIR and
EROI of oil and gas as well as coal were all in decline for two time periods within the last
40 years, and both time periods preceded economic recessions.
Keywords: energy, net energy, energy return on energy invested, energy intensity, energy
economics
S Online supplementary data available from stacks.iop.org/ERL/5/044006/mmedia
2.1. EIR of oil and petroleum
The EIRp,oil typically lies between 10 and 30, but from 1949
to 2008 it ranges from 7.5 (1981) to 48 (1998) with a value of
8.8 in 2008 marking the year of the highest oil price in history
and the beginning of the latest time period of US economic
recession. The minimum EIRp,oil of 7.5 in 1981 also coincided
with the peak of an economic recession in the US as well as the
time of the highest overall cost of petroleum as a percentage
of GDP at 8.5% (EIA 2008). EIRe,petro from 1970 to 2006
ranged from 5.3 in 1981 to 15.9 in 1998, the same years for
the lowest and highest EIRp,oil. In 1981 EIRp,oil:EIRe,petro was
1.43:1 (minimum) and in 1998 3.05:1 (maximum). The EIRp,oil from 1949 to 1972 gradually increased from 19 to 29 with little volatility in the value. This lack of volatility can possibly be attributed to the Texas Railroad Commission (TRC) acting as an oil cartel by prorationing oil production in Texas from 1935 to 1973 to create a price floor for balancing supply and demand (Prindle 1981). With Texas as the swing state oil producer until US peak production in 1970, this balancing on the price was possible.
After 1972, the increased oil prices in 1973, caused by the
Arab oil embargos, and again in 1979, impacted by the Iranian
Revolution, forced the EIRp,oil to drop (e.g. lower Btu/$ in the
numerator of (1)). After the mid-1980s, the EIRp,oil follows
a general rise and fall, with increased volatility and a steady
declining trend since 1994 (with one anomalously high value
in 1998). Due to the dramatic drop in the price of oil from 2008
to 2009, the EIRp,oil is higher in 2009.2
Tim, You say and have said before many times that.
“All of these hopes miss the fundamental point, which is that ECoEs are very much higher now (above 9%) than they were in the 1970s (at or below 2%).”
Russian and Saudi Lifting costs account for a very large part of core world supply and also proved reserves for future supply, as the proved reserves are using enhanced recovery methods but not the more expensive heat-based recovery of non-conventional heavy oils. I think the simple claim that a substantial proportion of world oil production and continuing supply from those reserves are still at High ECOEs, can you prove otherwise?
Accessible data available in admittedly partial data sets, contradict the very stark claim you make that up to the 1990’s it cost 2 barrels of oil to extract 100 barrels giving a net 98 surplus energy barrels. and that now the energy cost is 9 barrels of every 100 giving 91 surplus barrels.
Adjusted lifting costs on a per-dollar basis have if anything fallen, it is also possible that for Giant fields that lifting costs have actually fallen in Energy terms.
Are your 2% and 9% figures theoretically or empirically derived and if empirically could you please provide the data source from which you derive such a bold claim?
It is also unsatisfactory not to provide adjusted figures for the different souces be they, conventional Land, off shore, deep sea and shallow and deeper conventional sources.
At this point I think it is reasonable to put the End of cheap oil in energy terms theorists to proof.
This paper tackles the question in energy terms and not assumptions drawn from monetary/price assumptions. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687841/
Kyiv, Warsaw, the Bucharest Nine, and 54 nations in the Ramstein armaments group show the scope of world opposition to the Kremlin butchers; UN Security Council hears unproven theories on Nordstream pipelines; General Assembly demands Russian forces leave Ukraine by vote of 141 to 7, with 32 abstentions; South Africa should remember Moscow’s food warfare vs Africa; India’s Modi may seize moment for increased authoritarianism in what was once called the world’s largest democracy;
Putin’s major speech was a collection of threats to oligarchs and nomenklatura, demanding that they repatriate their foreign holdings and finance Russia; Low energy and tepid response;
Clumsy leaks from Fulton County GA grand jury foreperson suggest bad news is imminent for Don and 12 apostles; AG Garland is a threat to Biden’s re-election and must go; Jack Smith subpoenas Meadows, Meadows, and Jarvanka;
FDR’s landmark fireside chat of May 27 1941 explained the forward defense of the western hemisphere to isolationists: ”When your enemy comes at you in a tank or a bombing plane, if you hold your fire until you see the whites of his eyes, you will never know what hit you. Our Bunker Hill of tomorrow may be several thousand miles from Boston.”
“Talk about centralisation! The credit system, which has its focus in the so-called national banks and the big money-lenders and usurers surrounding them, constitutes enormous centralisation, and gives this class of parasites the fabulous power, not only to periodically despoil industrial capitalists, but also to interfere in actual production in a most dangerous manner— and this gang knows nothing about production and has nothing to do with it.” –
See more at:
I have been working for the past month exclusively on Oligarchy and this talk by Webster Tarpley has a very good analysis of where we have come from and where things seem to be headed.
Tarpley has a lot of good things to say one has to get past the inevitable point at which he will challenge and dismiss something one holds very dear, he upsets everyone I think but his analysis is always an interesting starting point. Of all my own enquiries recently the most revelatory insight I stumbled across was the concept of Hybridity introduced in this paper on the nature of Islamaphobia in Sweden. http://inhouse.lau.edu.lb/bima/papers/Jonas_Otterbeck.pdf
´´ According to the historian Åsa Karlsson, who cites among others Peter Burke, the upper classes of an emerging (Western) Europe came to distance themselves more and more from both the other classes of their own societies and from other cultures. At the same time, there was an urge for knowledge about the others that they had distanced themselves from. (16) This change of attitude towards other ethnic groups, classes, and religions has also been discussed by other Swedish scholars. (17)
16. Å. Karlsson 1998:84ff.
17.Larsson cited in Å Karlsson 1998:84; Ambjörnsson 1994:33ff. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybridity
This brilliant documentary by Tim Gielen reveals how a small group of super-rich criminals has been buying virtually everything on earth until they own it all. From media, health care, travel, food industry, governments… That allows them to control the whole world. Because of this, they are trying to impose the New World Order.
2 thoughts on “#Texit meets Brexit, Meet the Fuggers and the Rockerfellers. More States less Feds. More Europe Less Brussels. TEXAS GOLD STANDARD (Black Gold Globalism) #ChestertonsGate”
5,367,580 (1 January 2020)[3]
24.8 low (2018, Eurostat)[8]
9th (very easy, 2020)[14]
36.5% of GDP (2017 est.)[6][note 1]
NA
.jpg)
Rest of the UK 60%
European Union 19%[11]
United States £5.5 bn
France £3.0 bn
Netherlands £2.8 bn
Germany £2.5 bn
Belgium £1.3 bn
Canada
Japan
China.jpeg)
3.5% (December 2022)[9]
The Economic Superorganism: Beyond the Competing Narratives on Energy, Growth, and Policy by Carey W. King
TARPLEY.net – World Crisis Radio
http://thdrussell.blogspot.com/2011/12/from-here-to-there.html ”
2 thoughts on “#Texit meets Brexit, Meet the Fuggers and the Rockerfellers. More States less Feds. More Europe Less Brussels. TEXAS GOLD STANDARD (Black Gold Globalism) #ChestertonsGate”