
Susan J. Supriano
1938 – 2015
Richard Moore: Part 1
“Escaping the Matrix: How We the People Can Change the World” — Moore talks about the first half of his book which focuses on the issues of hierarchy and manipulation of the people with lies…
Play Audio.
TRT: 28:00
Date: 2007-01-22
Richard Moore: Part 2
“Escaping the Matrix: How We the People Can Change the World” — Moore talks about the second part of his book which focuses on how we can build a more localized, democratic society…
Play Audio.
TRT: 28:00
Date: 2007-01-21
Sur Supriano Steppin outta Babylon and Robert Moorehttps://t.co/HWHdMS9506
— Real-Estate Land Development Limited (@RealEstateLand3) May 2, 2023
Bruce Charlton is a sort of Intellectual glue which holds my own framework of understanding together.
Thus, the major output of the modern international Mass Media consists of only four categories:
- Good presented as bad
- Bad presented as Good
(That is to say simple inversion)
- Good presented as Good for a bad reason
- Bad presented as bad for a bad reason
(That is to say explanatory inversion)

PUBLISHED DATE:MARCH 19, 2019
Richard Moore at the time of this Sue Supriano Steppin Outta Babylon interview was still talking about “Climate Change” in Main Stream Matrix terms, the interview was in 2007 and the earliest references to Richards Blogging go back to 1995. Johnny Wedmore’s question as to who had provided clues , parts of frameworks or whole frameworks to question the Reality of the “Matrix” Illicited reference to both Sue and Richard by yours truly.
https://cyberjournal.org/?s=Climate+Change
At that link you can see the evolution of Richards thinking on the Climate Change Narrative as opposed to the Environmental issues left unaddressed by “Climatism” with a more #Wrongkindofgreen Skeptisism.
Richard — I’m certain from long familiarity that you’re not a front for the carbon industry but, in the light of your recent postings on climate change, I’d be hard pressed to prove it.We need to know who funds these thinktank lobbyistsThe battle for democracy is becoming a fight against backroom billionaires seeking to shape politics to suit their own interestsGeorge Monbiotguardian.co.uk, Monday 20 February 2012 20.30 GMT
I completely agree with you on Thrive. A man from the Proctor & Gamble family who has had an epiphany? Nah I can’t see it. Lots of oneness in the feel of that movie. I am also suspicious of the idea of the solutions on offer.I like the idea of a movie/docu-movie. What about a discussion movie. RKM in discussion. An global overview, global elite discussion, global banking discussion, then a move to possible solutions, IMHO I believe the solutions start with communities, it may be a starting point of a discussion which might open a door for many?What say you?
Catherine Austin Fitts wrote: February 22, 2012
Richard:I have known Foster Gamble and his wife Kimberly since 2006 and consider them good friends. Thrive is a very sincere attempt at defining problems and solutions. If you look at the drain of the black budget and the technology it is funding, it is essential to look at these issues although trying to ascertain the truth is challenging. But UFOS and crop circles are real, and if my estimates of the black budget are reasonable, a lot of money is being harvested to finance them or dealing with them or both. So these issues must be dealt with, no matter how messy they are.Truth will emerge from a widespread conversation. Thrive was meant to contribute to that conversation, just as you do.Hope that helps,Catherine Austin Fittsrkm February 22, 2012
I’ve been looking at the Thrive website. We now have not just the film, we have a Thrive Movement. The website is full of pages giving ‘solutions’ and ‘strategies’ for the various problems of the world. The basic philosophy behind Thrive’s vision is libertarianism and unregulated markets. Everything privatized, and the government’s only role is to manage the money supply. It’s vulture capitalism all over again, only Thrive looks at it though rose colored glasses and imagines it would be different.
I don’t see the Thrive Movement leading to any kind of useful conversation. It will attract a lot of libertarian followers, and followers who happened to be fascinated by the film, but I can’t see the comment threads (if that be conversation) going outside the boundaries of thinking established by the website.As regards its strategy, let’s look at the ‘governance solutions strategies’ page. It sets out three stages of transformation.:
Stage 1: Reform the election system and redirect government prioritiesStage 2: Limit GovernmentStage 3: Set Up Systems for Voluntary CooperationIn the spirit of conversation, I would suggest that these stages are in the wrong order.People have been fighting for election reform for a very long time, and for more sensible government priorities. And what we are seeing instead is increasingly rigged elections and increasingly reckless government priorities. This is a losing battle, a consumer of activist fodder.And asking the government to limit itself? The attempt to limit government power was made boldly when the Constitution was adopted. And ever since then those limits have been diligently and systematically eroded, until today we have neither a Bill of Rights, nor the separation of powers, nor the limitation on federal powers. Another losing battle.With all respect, I must say this is not a strategy; it is a wish list, unless I’m missing something. Stage 3 is where you really want to get to. Stages 1 and 2 are wishes, which if granted would make Stage 3 easy. Beggars would ride.If systems for voluntary cooperation are where you want to end up, then I suggest building those systems is where you need to begin. Only a people unified can take on the tasks of Stage 1 and Stage 2. Not unified by a charismatic leader or ideology, but unified by their systems of voluntary cooperation. The ends are the means.Occupy talks about the 99%. They are right, in that the overwhelming majority of us are now brought together by the economic crisis, and by the realization that the system is floundering, that governments are unable to deal with the crisis. This creates a political opportunity: creating a movement that builds on this ‘coming together’ and this ‘realization’, and begins building the infrastructures of ‘voluntary cooperation’, or what I prefer to call ‘voluntary collaboration’.
rkm February 22, 2012
Mind Control and The ‘Conspiracy Theory’ Meme. Echoes of George Orwell and Aldous Huxley
We are able to see the architecture – the structural patterns – of each kind of mind-control regime. This can help us recognize precursors – signs that such a future is coming our way.
Dystopian predictions
In 1984, George Orwell paints a picture of a dark, gray world. People are afraid to say anything contrary to the official party line, and surveillance is universal. Even thinking contrary to the party is a crime, and thoughtcrimes may be treated by radical psychological intervention. Information is closely controlled by the party media, and the historical record is routinely edited, so as to conform to the latest party statements.
By contrast, in Brave New World, Aldous Huxley paints a colorful, superficially pleasant world. Personal freedom of all kinds is encouraged, even to the point of being a cultural imperative. In the book a young boy is referred to a therapist, because he doesn’t want to play sex games with a girl classmate. An adult character is considered aberrant, because he is drawn toward a monogamous relationship. Drugs and distractions are readily available for mood enhancement.
Manipulation, like the conquest whose objectives it serves, attempts to anesthetize the people so they will not think. https://t.co/3NPiqs55XE #TragedyandHope 1st as Tragedy then as Farce pic.twitter.com/zegSJAWL3x
— Real-Estate Land Development Limited (@RealEstateLand3) May 3, 2023
Groves work is good his mind map is brilliant.https://t.co/zImkuX5ElE
— Real-Estate Land Development Limited (@RealEstateLand3) May 2, 2023
We’re an empire Now #TheGreatReset #Iconoclasm #Zealotry #ObeidiencetoAbove Welcome to the Brave New World of #PEANACFascism.
SEPTEMBER 11, 2021
https://t.co/Kt5TqxGDdO mainly because they like most of the rest of us discover #chestertonsgate, later in life.
— Real-Estate Land Development Limited (@RealEstateLand3) May 3, 2023
THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF OLIGARCHICAL COLLECTIVISM by Emmanuel Goldstein
NOVEMBER 10, 2016
Many things can cause us as humans to stop listening, we all of us do not like to hear bad news or to hear information which challenges that which we wish to be true. Down the ages, it has always been this way as far as we can gather. In this susceptibility to tune into what we want to hear lies the heart of the art of being followed. Followers will follow those who others seem to believe in, sometimes the route prescribed works out, reputations are gained and eventually myths are born. At what point do we turn back though from a course which seems to be leading us up a wrong path we find it hard to convince ourselves often that what should have worked is not now working, after all, it has always worked in the past.
Our only debt is to Nature and ‘What Is’. Environmental Pragmatism, Live and let live.
https://t.co/AjsYXnwvby gate fence #ChestertonsFence
— Real-Estate Land Development Limited (@RealEstateLand3) May 3, 2023
Part 7 #ConquestofDough 7. The Great, “What Is”? Our Only Debt is to Nature.
PUBLISHED DATE:JANUARY 29, 2017
Red Lines, Settled Science, The end of History and entitled Facts.
I did a blog about Boris Johnson at the United Nations General Assembly on the last occasion of the periodic scolding of both the truth and of Bashar Assad, (http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2016/09/syria-cui-bono-incitatus-boris-johnson.html )
Since then the catechism of fake news has developed into a higher art form and as such I have been musing over the idea that, how would Claims made in newspapers or television media look if they were subject to the same rigors as claiming a patent over an invention, or innovation, what would the patent clerk turned truth clerk make of it all when he looked at his in-tray (inbox) of the hopeful claimants to a unique claim to some previously unasserted or unknown truth. We are further asked to bow to expert opinion, what constitutes an expert these days? Further how much better is an experts opinion than any other opinion where the content is speculation even common sense.
Any thoughts? pic.twitter.com/rc7KTacz6o
— Professor John Hearn (@jbhearn) May 2, 2023
PUBLISHED DATE:MAY 4, 2017
Belloc characterised the reformation as
´´a rising of the rich against the poor´´,(1)
´and indeed Calvin had written the unfortunate statement:
´´The people must always be kept in poverty in order that they remain obedient´´.(2)
“In a situation of manipulation, the Left is almost always tempted by a “quick return to power,” forgets the necessity of joining with the oppressed to forge an organization, and strays into an impossible “dialogue” with the dominant elites. It ends by being manipulated by these elites, and not infrequently itself falls in an elitist game, which it calls “realism.”
Manipulation, like the conquest whose objectives it serves, attempts to anesthetize the people so they will not think. For if the people join to their presence in the historical process critical thinking about that process, the threat of their emergence materializes in revolution…One of the methods of manipulation is to inoculate individuals with the bourgeois appetite for personal success. This manipulation is sometimes carried out directly by the elites and sometimes indirectly, through populist leaders.”
8th September 2016
PUBLISHED DATE:JANUARY 6, 2016
“Talk about centralisation! The credit system, which has its focus in the so-called national banks and the big money-lenders and usurers surrounding them, constitutes enormous centralisation, and gives this class of parasites the fabulous power, not only to periodically despoil industrial capitalists, but also to interfere in actual production in a most dangerous manner— and this gang knows nothing about production and has nothing to do with it.” –
http://www.debtdeflation.com/blogs/2009/01/31/therovingcavaliersofcredit/#sthash.d4gs1dAX.dpuf
Marx, Capital Volume III, Chapter 33, The medium of circulation in the credit system, pp. 544–45 [Progress Press]
Feb 25 2016
Feb 19 2017
April 23 2017
March 3 2019
APRIL 1, 2020
March 24 2022
PUBLISHED DATE:JULY 4, 2022
The Conquest of Circuses.

Come see the show, a spectacle to behold.
Laugh, gasp, and wonder, at the stories told.
Feats of strength, courage, and obedience
The bread of suspended beliefs magnificence.

Regarde les tableaux, catch it on Zoom
a trapeze sans net, a dramatic tune
Unprecedented they said since that War
enjoy the spectacle, don’t make a furore

enraptured,seduced the entertained group.
A low price of entry makes you the dupe
Those Roman circuses, coupled to Dole
if you want bread? know the circuses’ role.
To the land of Setting sun Tally-Ho
an anti socially distanced event
only the big screen regarde les tableaux
catch it on Zoom its forbidden to GoUnprecedented they said since the War
Nurnberg was I suppose before, yet what of 74?
Seventy Eight and 82, room 101 1984.
best enjoy the spectacle, don’t make a furoreGoogle Geo Political Advantages
Facebook your genetic allegiances
Scream it down you tube once mourn
Wikipedia sets it in aspick forsworn.Has Aunty been Mistaken
Did Walkers inform her comment
In Sexed up dossier reportage
distracted by decollage, truth inoculation.
Roger G Lewis 2022 (CopyLeft)
Jan 8 2017
Why are we here, An essay provoked by Golem XIv´s David Malones latest Documentary Series.
PUBLISHED DATE:MARCH 28, 2017
Globalisation Un-Entangled. (A FOUND POEM, CIPHER OF GLOBALISM )
PUBLISHED DATE:SEPTEMBER 29, 2016
Bourgeois resolution. A poem in Three Voices for added 4th part Harmony.
and pained to see. This revolution of , by and for Whom?
Conquest of Dough
The Conquest of Dough,
Part 1 Introduction.
The wise king said, “A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in vessels of silver” (Prov. xxv. 11). Hear the explanation of what he said:—The word maskiyoth, the Hebrew equivalent for “vessels,” denotes “filigree network”—i.e., things in which there are very small apertures, such as are frequently wrought by silversmiths. They are called in Hebrew maskiyyoth (lit. “transpicuous,” from the verb sakah, “he saw,” a root which occurs also in the Targum of Onkelos, Gen. xxvi. 8), because the eye penetrates through them. Thus Solomon meant to say, “just as apples of gold in silver filigree with small apertures, so is a word fitly spoken.”
Maimonides, A Guide for the Perplexed.
Part 2 The Last Bakery In Aleppo.
The Conquest of Dough
Part 3 The Road to Damascus
4
The Sky is Falling In.
5.
Bunto Thompson UNGA. Once You Clear The Bodies
Abdul shouted into the Valley,
“Brothers I will return to retrace our forbears’ journey of truth and peace.”
Part 7 #ConquestofDough 7. The Great, “What Is”? Our Only Debt is to Nature.
Finally David Malone and the GolemXIV Blog
HORIZON 30TH ANNIVERSARY THE FARSIDE. 23 MAY 1994 E.16. A Behind Hand Review.